SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Tulipomania Blowoff Contest: Why and When will it end?
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3543 66 0 YHOO
Emcee:  Sir Auric Goldfinger Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2468 IS, I agree with your analysis of the risk in the NASDAQ tech stocks. What canMad2-1/6/2000
2467 Schmart money has been going into deep cyclicals since mid December. Thoe stocSir Auric Goldfinger-1/6/2000
2466 During every correction which started slowly, but quickly gained (downside) momRockyBalboa-1/6/2000
2465 More opinions from the pros... How come Auric's not quoted here? <g> EL KABONG!!!-1/6/2000
2464 Hello August, <I>Is this an '87 senerio or are we looking more at thEL KABONG!!!-1/6/2000
2463 I didn't quite understand what you said about your margin situation. If yoBelowTheCrowd-1/6/2000
2462 Hi Cheeky, <I>you can't compare that to quality high tech companies&EL KABONG!!!-1/6/2000
2461 Neither, '87 was a one-day, 30% drop. We haven't even seen a third ofBelowTheCrowd-1/6/2000
2460 Wait a second, KIS-- I want to also stake a claim. And, unlike your claim, I dBearded One-1/6/2000
2459 <i>Neither...a brand new scenario!</i> That's a lot of help<AugustWest-1/6/2000
2458 Lemmings?Cheeky Kid-1/6/2000
2457 AugustWest: <i>Is this an '87 senerio or are we looking more at the &HairBall-1/6/2000
2456 SO tell me, those of you been 'round long enough. Is this an '87 senerAugustWest-1/6/2000
2455 cheeky, this is a tech-gold rush, don't fool yourself into thinking this qubobby beara-1/6/2000
2454 bb, <i>>Many dot.coms are sleazy bucket shops that will never earn moCheeky Kid-1/6/2000
2453 HI Joana and welcome: <i>Speaking of retirement - so many Baby Boomers wbobby beara-1/6/2000
2452 Am i allowed to enter the contest from the lesser-travelled door to the right? Joana Tides-1/6/2000
2451 Well guys, it looks as if I am about to win the contest. I posted my predictioKeepItSimple-1/6/2000
2450 You saying buying opps are created and 401k money rolls in later Jan? InterestiRockyBalboa-1/6/2000
2449 >>>The impact on traditional advertising is collateral from the internbobby beara-1/6/2000
2448 I understand what you mean and look at the internet stocks same way. You willRockyBalboa-1/6/2000
2447 After the LU warning, tomorrow will be another bloodbath for techs.EOM KyrosL-1/6/2000
2446 Well, yea, the Y2K stuff was clearly wrong. And I don't think this sellingZog-1/6/2000
2445 Pretty good! But Y2K selling, dunno, more like y2K holdoff, no? There was no gaSir Auric Goldfinger-1/6/2000
2444 How am I looking? #reply-12392636? Given Lucent just warned, I suspect things Zog-1/6/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):