SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Winspear Resources
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
26850 33 0 WSP
Emcee:  Dave M Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
26375Larry: You have to understand that anybody who would be considering putting tog.Trev-8/2/2000
26374I wonder how many folks are filling their boots at these prices. Not often you cddl-8/2/2000
26373Probably got something to do with their preparation for distribution of the unde.Trev-8/2/2000
26372So you claimed that tons, carat values and future earnings are contradicted by tlarry_d-8/2/2000
26371If I were considering submitting a competitive bid I would be waiting and watchiwayne cath-8/2/2000
26370See my edit, previous post. eom MargieMrsNose-8/2/2000
26369DOH! Free Stockwatch! All these years reading in the background, and now with solarry_d-8/2/2000
26368That's the private placement that was announced in June, to raise funds for MrsNose-8/2/2000
26367Hi Mrs. Nose, Do you know what this means (in laymans terms, please)? It's alarry_d-8/2/2000
26366I see CC is dumping quite a bit. Why would they be dumping at below DB offer?ddl-8/2/2000
26365Subject: From sedar Ontario Commission des PO Box 55, Suite 800 CP 55, Bureau 8MrsNose-8/2/2000
26364From looking at the tape, I think $4.00 may be a coincidence of: 1) A slow traTony from Niagara-8/2/2000
26363RTQ $4.25!! WSP hit a low of $4.00... something must be up..ddl-8/2/2000
26362Larry, you are correct that DBRs has not been to the data room to date.This may james flannigan-8/2/2000
26361All too true, James. Flipping back a bit, did you notice that (and I can't rlarry_d-8/2/2000
26360Lets remove wsp shareholders from the situation and look at it from a DBRs pointjames flannigan-8/2/2000
26359There can only be one answer. Its not as good as we all wish it were Yeah Wayne.Trev-8/2/2000
26358This type of situation, re: hostile buyouts and WK's, its new to me. But by larry_d-8/2/2000
26357Wayne,thank you for the quick reply.I spoke to WSP late yesterday afternoon.My qjames flannigan-8/2/2000
26356I agree with all of the points you make. I am saying that all the claims regardwayne cath-8/2/2000
26355Wayne,I can understand your thinking about tendering your shares for 15 cents onjames flannigan-8/2/2000
26354Wayne - I'm not entirely convinced that the share price tanks when the bidLorne-8/2/2000
26353.Trev - I realize that you're not talking to me but here goes. You shouldLorne-8/1/2000
26352Who, more than a Debeers competitor, would be damaged by this attempted steal suwayne cath-8/1/2000
26351Wayne - I admit that I'm in the quiet desperation phase and moving towardsLorne-8/1/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News