SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Semi Equipment Analysis
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
96313 489 0 SOXX
Emcee:  Return to Sender Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3901Merrill's sweeping downgrades in the chip equipment sector wont help us keepRMP-7/9/2002
3900AMAT has gone from 27 to 19 over the past few weeks and NOW Merrill Lynch decideThe Ox-7/9/2002
3899Here's the proper way to phrase the SOXX-double-bottom question: ==========scott_jiminez-7/9/2002
3898I'm here and I have Nasdaq to drop to 1100 first and then 800 in 2003...checSoftechie-7/9/2002
3897AD, good luck to you means good luck for me, too. G. [end]Gottfried-7/9/2002
3896I hear what your sayin' RTS, and you won't find me arguing with you. Heradvocatedevil-7/9/2002
3895AD, your vote was a classic. Are you from Floridha? <ggg> Just kidding, lLemonHead-7/9/2002
3894It's too late for me G, I opened my mouth last week on another thread and readvocatedevil-7/8/2002
3893Interesting thought but what if we have to bounce downhill all the way to 1998 tReturn to Sender-7/8/2002
3892RtS, I wonder if this could be modeled as a ball bouncing down an incline? stockGottfried-7/8/2002
3891AD, you almost always make me laugh. Seriously I think we will end up with a ralReturn to Sender-7/8/2002
3890AD, I like the way you don't hedge your opinion. :) Now post the opposite onGottfried-7/8/2002
3889Um Ron... Will the SOX double bottom hold? Your vote please? So far we have faReturn to Sender-7/8/2002
3888>> So will the double bottom hold? Well, on the one hand, ........... AhSarmad Y. Hermiz-7/8/2002
3887Kind of scary when everyone is in agreement. I hope your right! If not I will hRMP-7/8/2002
3886I'm solidly with the "Yes, it will hold" camp! Uh, well, maybe I sadvocatedevil-7/8/2002
3885RtS, I vote for the double bottom holding. I'm doing some traveling this wDonald Wennerstrom-7/8/2002
3884The SOX double bottom holds??? Vote here: stockcharts.com[w,a]dhclyiay[pb50!b20Return to Sender-7/8/2002
3883RtS, SOX will hold. Today an additional 4 stocks in NDX made PnF buy signals. BpGottfried-7/8/2002
3882SOX double bottom. Up or down from here? Vote here please: In September 2001 weReturn to Sender-7/8/2002
3881OT: Silicon Investor is simply a comfortable place for us to exchange ideas. I&#Return to Sender-7/8/2002
3880Sarmad, leaving that headline unchanged it will be accurate half the time at leaGottfried-7/8/2002
3879Anyone notice that the SI news headline is stuck on "<b>Tech Shares LSarmad Y. Hermiz-7/8/2002
3878From Briefing.com: 12:55PM Semiconductor sector lifts modestly off support : -- Return to Sender-7/8/2002
3877I believe an added reason why there has been a drop in the semis lately is the cThe Ox-7/8/2002
3876Investment House Weekend Update: investmenthouse.com - Rally continues after nReturn to Sender-7/7/2002
3875Don, I watch the earnings estimates and PEGs that you post, regularly, for the Cary Salsberg-7/6/2002
3874Cary, You certainly have had a plan and you stuck with it over a long period. Donald Wennerstrom-7/6/2002
3873<B>Perspective</b> From Rande suite101.com Which is it? Are we stiKirk ©-7/6/2002
3872Kirk, [edited] thanks for your VIX comments. I notice there are no recommendatioGottfried-7/6/2002
3871<I> RtS, VIX and fear: I don't know for sure but I think the level of Kirk ©-7/6/2002
3870I am fully invested so I don't need to worry about how I will react to more Cary Salsberg-7/5/2002
3869RtS, I suppose one could look for articles about the Israelis' reaction to cGottfried-7/5/2002
3868Don, get on your soapbox any time. your post 'feels' right. [end]Gottfried-7/5/2002
3867Gottfried my common sense tells me that although we may be numb to some of what Return to Sender-7/5/2002
3866Gottfried, I like your post. You are saying I think what I wanted to say, but Donald Wennerstrom-7/5/2002
3865I agree with everything you said Don. It's just that a very good case can stReturn to Sender-7/5/2002
3864Don, re ><i>I'm watching and waiting for the upcoming action. BasedGottfried-7/5/2002
3863RtS, Nice assessment of your thoughts on where we are and where we may be goingDonald Wennerstrom-7/5/2002
3862RtS, VIX and fear: I don't know for sure but I think the level of fear one cGottfried-7/5/2002
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News