SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Who Really Pays Taxes?
An SI Board Since August 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
666 29 0
Emcee:  c.horn Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
416Saw it already. Wished they'd waited til tomorrow. But the dems reaction isBill-8/17/2000
415Speaking of which.. Look what got leaked today..-gg- washingtonpost.comc.horn-8/17/2000
414You obviously don't know presidential greatness when it is apparent to everyBill-8/17/2000
413LOL!!!! You've got no clue whatsoever dood.c.horn-8/17/2000
412I've "tried" Reagan of nothing. Personally, I thought of him as aMichelino-8/17/2000
411LOL!! Ya, that'll help us out a lot.-G3-c.horn-8/17/2000
410The only solution is NADER. Go Ralph!Bill-8/17/2000
409<i> Defense spending needs to be refocused. AGREE. Not an expert TimF-8/17/2000
408That was when Social Security taxes were only 3 percent and only levied against Les H-8/17/2000
407kvkkc1...suprise... <i> I don't have a problem with eliminating Sociaztect-8/17/2000
406The current tax system and the prohibitive high rates are really at fault. It nLes H-8/17/2000
405I don't have a problem with eliminating Social Security and Medicare except kvkkc1-8/17/2000
404<i> Even though low income earners pay little federal income tax, they areTimF-8/17/2000
403<i> I'm refering to corporate welfare, and a specific example pertainiTimF-8/17/2000
402true but its less wrong than taxing income, since nobody wants to work for a salLizzie Tudor-8/17/2000
401<i> Clinton lied. So did Reagan. Neither of them should have. </i> TimF-8/17/2000
400<i> Reagan "conservatives" spent money on many weapons systems tTimF-8/17/2000
399A lot of the more expensive homes are also in the newer subdivisions around hereLes H-8/17/2000
398<i>Net worth would also be bogus as a measurement...</i> In my cityPMS Witch-8/17/2000
397Even though low income earners pay little federal income tax, they are subject tkvkkc1-8/17/2000
396Net worth would also be bogus as a measurement. You can't really class someoLes H-8/17/2000
395District to pay parents $ 3000-7500 to arrange transportation of special ed chilLes H-8/17/2000
394<i> So, what to do? Perhaps, curtail our own expectations for large Gordon A. Langston-8/17/2000
393The only lynch mob in our discussion was the anti-Reagan wackos. You tried and Bill-8/17/2000
392<i>The bottom half of taxpayers pay 4% of income taxes</I> I wonderLizzie Tudor-8/17/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News