SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL)
An SI Board Since April 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5102 19 0 INPR
Emcee:  Kashish King Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4452 Whatever benefits there may or may not be, a successful company requires an effatvcb-2/10/2000
4451 Re: <i>"Fuller wants to move on w"</i> That seems to be TTOSBT-2/10/2000
4450 John: "Can't INPR do that itself?" In a word: "Yes." AnBig Dog-2/10/2000
4449 David: "The problem here is I'm not sure who else there is to be doingBig Dog-2/10/2000
4448 Can someone please explain to me why we need to give the Cowboy our warchest soJohn Solder-2/10/2000
4447 <i>And, if a new bidder should show-up, I imagine that the lawyers have pi-node-2/10/2000
4446 <i>If you think that old shrink-wrapped software defines the success of Ji-node-2/10/2000
4445 TTOBST: Looks like you were correct. Fuller already has his plans in motion: wBig Dog-2/10/2000
4444 Thank you for your kind words. I've never seen a merger voted down. So, I dBig Dog-2/10/2000
4443 So basically Java failed to live up to being a way to write cross platform appsMark Bracey-2/9/2000
4442 <i>Okay, Rod, answer the question. Could you name the two or three top-seKashish King-2/9/2000
4441 I believe that they are saying that MS is forcing software down the throats of dwc-2/9/2000
4440 Interesting comments on the Borland newsgroup from Rick Rogers. Notice his opinMark Bracey-2/9/2000
4439 I can name a major app written in Java that is being used by thousands (if not Mark Bracey-2/9/2000
4438 I think they have done this before. It amounts to publicity for MSFT. Just thinTTOSBT-2/9/2000
4437 REUTERS BRUSSELS, Feb. 9 — The European Commission has started an investigadwc-2/9/2000
4436 Darrell: (1) I have, as I assume other INPR shareholders as well, greatly appratvcb-2/9/2000
4435 talk about salt in our wounds.. globeandmail.com petePeter H. Mack-2/9/2000
4434 Carolyn, an arbitrage position is very common for institutions. The short posiDennis Nicks-2/9/2000
4433 Re: <i>"Why would Fuller do this to us INPR shareholders?"</TTOSBT-2/9/2000
4432 <I> he has said to Wall Street that INPR is fairly valued at $15/share. AJohn Solder-2/9/2000
4431 Thanks Annette. I'm thoroughly disappointed in Dale Fuller. I can't belBig Dog-2/9/2000
4430 A CEO whining is not good....good for you selling, Darrell.Annette-2/9/2000
4429 Will anyone out on the West Coast call INPR and ask some of the pointed questioCarolyn-2/9/2000
4428 Kiriakos, I was tempted to congratulate you for an insightful post a day or soFred Gohlke-2/9/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):