SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Famous SI PIG ZSUN DISCOVERY QUESTIONS THREAD
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
96 12 0
Emcee:  StockDung Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
46 flodyie: I have been thinking the same thing....I think it would make a good ThHairBall-7/7/1999
45 Looks like a good class action lawsuit for everyone that has had their informaStockDung-7/7/1999
44 Let me think about that............... R.E.B.-7/7/1999
43 REB: SI Administration has no policy requiring its staff to inform SI members bHairBall-7/7/1999
42 Agree. Especially with these 100 John Doe lawsuits floating about. In addition,broken_cookie-7/7/1999
41 select provisions of the Terms of Use: 2.4 Silicon Investor reserves the rightPeter V-7/7/1999
40 Want to sue them for me? lol FloydStockDung-7/7/1999
39 Unless ordered to do so (eg. criminal investigation) I think SI should give youR.E.B.-7/7/1999
38 <i>no calls from SI. They never notify anyone or even tell you they gave Peter V-7/7/1999
37 no calls from SI. They never notify anyone or even tell you they gave out thisStockDung-7/7/1999
36 Did SI contact you and offer you the opportunity to challenge the subpoena? OrPeter V-7/7/1999
35 They sent a subpoena to SI just like I intend to do with many of the posters oStockDung-7/7/1999
34 So they did serve you with the complaint? Via Fed Ex and then asked you to verPeter V-7/7/1999
33 There's another thing or two wrong with it, but why should I do them any fawho cares?-7/6/1999
32 Thats because they were in a hurry to show credibility. The even fed-x the papStockDung-7/6/1999
31 How serious can this suit be when they are claiming one of the defendants is lolindend-7/6/1999
30 Agreed, jurisdiction is established if one of the parties resides in the FederaR.E.B.-7/6/1999
29 Likewise, we hope the 'ZSUN 8' prevail, and any research ground we'Bill Ulrich-7/6/1999
28 . . . what Bill said. <G> SLAPP suits are usually directed at individuPeter V-7/6/1999
27 Adding to Peter's definition: &#133shut up critics by wreaking the finaBill Ulrich-7/6/1999
26 I can't get into your website right now. Why did BW sue you? An anti-SLAPPeter V-7/6/1999
25 You get into federal court in only two circumstances: (1) you have diversity anPeter V-7/6/1999
24 That's similar to our own case where there may be seperate state and federaBill Ulrich-7/6/1999
23 "What was the basis for jdx? Diversity? It's pretty risky naming speciCatLady-7/6/1999
22 Here is the complaint: ragingbull.com The federal questions appear to be secuPeter V-7/6/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):