SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
HITSGALORE.COM (HITT)
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7056 46 0 HITT
Emcee:  bob sims Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5256 But what about bks and JB144? They were paid in stock. Assuming they ever gotJanice Shell-3/29/2000
5255 <i>get a shareholder to pay the PR firm with their stock</i> So DMighty_Mezz-3/29/2000
5254 The way people get around the Rule 701 change is to get a shareholder to pay thJeffrey S. Mitchell-3/29/2000
5253 I suppose, if it came down to it, they could get around Rule 701 by saying theyMighty_Mezz-3/29/2000
5252 Jeff, Thanks, I was beginning to think the changes were never made. it is Bear Down-3/29/2000
5251 Re: Rule 701 From an article cited by the Truthseeker: <i>Taking note oJeffrey S. Mitchell-3/29/2000
5250 Please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't the rule 701 changes made last Bear Down-3/29/2000
5249 <i>BTW, does anybody think HITT's 10k will be filed on time, by Fridadumbmoney-3/28/2000
5248 I'm curious as to where the shares to pay the new PR firm came from, absentMighty_Mezz-3/28/2000
5247 HITT hired a new tout. Judging from the news releases for the tout's otherQ.-3/28/2000
5246 Looks like there was a hearing Thursday in the suit to evict the horse lady. CQ.-3/27/2000
5245 Oh, that's a relief. The 144 seller's phone number belongs to a profitaQ.-3/27/2000
5244 Very interesting. The phone # on that 144, the one which a reverse-lookup saysMighty_Mezz-3/27/2000
5243 Who was the form 144 seller in the previous post? I checked the Edgar databaseQ.-3/27/2000
5242 Form 144 for HITSGALORE COM INC filed on Mar 22 2000 9:01AM Issuers Name HITSQ.-3/27/2000
5241 new developments in the $12 M Gillaspie suit against LFT ... There were docketQ.-3/26/2000
5240 re. <<I guess it's a given that the $100 mill LFT stock purchase isn&Q.-3/21/2000
5239 To all, Try this just for fun, go to the hitsgalore.com website and do a searcC E D-3/21/2000
5238 Ho Ho Ho. LOLTom Terf-3/21/2000
5237 To be strictly accurate HITT never said they deposited it, just that it would bMighty_Mezz-3/21/2000
5236 <i>Or will they be really smart, and seek a higher interest rate, let'Janice Shell-3/21/2000
5235 Damn. If I'd deposited a check for $3.5 million a month ago and it still hJanice Shell-3/21/2000
5234 re. <<$16.5 mill more should be paid within the next 48 hours.>> GQ.-3/21/2000
5233 According to the next paragraph in that 2/22 press release, $16.5 mill more shoMighty_Mezz-3/21/2000
5232 Tomorrow is the one-month anniversary of HITT receiving a $3.5 M check from LFTQ.-3/21/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):