SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silicon Graphics, Inc. (SGI)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
14451 67 0 SGI
Emcee:  Fan Jiao Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5850 Lines of code ???? And the answer is..................... lines words chThomas A Watson-3/11/1999
5849 Well if you arn't selling product. You use product to buy stock. If Wam cThomas A Watson-3/11/1999
5848 Kirk, A little pump-and-dump maybe? It's not like they haven't done thaBill Holtzman-3/11/1999
5847 I was looking at the last paragraph of the eetimes article that was posted in pKirk Vanden-3/11/1999
5846 Does the 105 million lines of code seem reasonable to you? Where do we go and Thomas A Watson-3/10/1999
5845 Off-topic: lines of code in XFree86 As one of the original, very minor, memberJerry Whlan-3/10/1999
5844 I have a difficult time understanding 105 million lines of code. How many uniqThomas A Watson-3/10/1999
5843 Silicon Graphics details MIPS road map eetimes.com By Anthodjane-3/10/1999
5842 Andrew, Thanks for the clarification. I was in a hurry to post that articleKirk Vanden-3/9/1999
5841 That 105 million lines of code support quite a large number of graphics cardsKirk Vanden-3/9/1999
5840 <<Years ago there were people whose job was to make code more efficient dNandu-3/9/1999
5839 > What ever happened to compact and efficient operating systems? Once upon Jerry Whlan-3/9/1999
5838 Yesterday they announced a new share purchase: sgi.com Now they'll be evebrushwud-3/9/1999
5837 Bill, thanks for the info. What ever happened to compact and efficient operatinWoody_Nickels-3/9/1999
5836 > I ran across this article on LinuxWorld today. It is > about SGIAlexis Cousein-3/9/1999
5835 35 million in Win2000 from the Business Week article. Bill Holtzman-3/9/1999
5834 105 million lines of code? How many lines in Win98? Just thought I'd ask,Woody_Nickels-3/8/1999
5833 All, I ran across this article on LinuxWorld today. It is about SGI's pKirk Vanden-3/8/1999
5832 > SGI did not know sooner that the P3 would give a > lackluster performanAlexis Cousein-3/8/1999
5831 Just spotted a neat ad for 1600SW on Barron's on-line. Quote from PC Mag &qBill Holtzman-3/7/1999
5830 I've been following SGI for over a year. I believe I am pessimistic on SGIThomas A Watson-3/7/1999
5829 <<Per SEC filing dated 2-16-99, Arthur S. Labatt c/o Trimark Financial oNandu-3/7/1999
5828 It says he owns none personally and Trimark has 3 million more than a year ago.brushwud-3/7/1999
5827 Per SEC filing dated 2-16-99, Arthur S. Labatt c/o Trimark Financial of OntarioRam Seetharaman-3/7/1999
5826 God bless America and my the Virgin Mary watch over the divine perfection of a Thomas A Watson-3/6/1999
5825 Tom, >>What is you do with borg software when those rare moments occur Kirk Vanden-3/6/1999
5824 Thomas A Watson wrote: >You know, I can't remember that last time I usedEdward Smyth-3/5/1999
5823 exceptional is ordinary and not special. TOm Watson tosiwme Thomas A Watson-3/4/1999
5822 >ya got ta be special to think special..... I prefer exceptional regards Don Green-3/4/1999
5821 Don, ya got ta be special to think special..... Tom Watson tosiwme Thomas A Watson-3/4/1999
5820 > But then again I'm special. ;=) That wasn't exactly what I was tDon Green-3/4/1999
5819 You know, I can't remember that last time I used a borg OS for anything. IThomas A Watson-3/4/1999
5818 dd, >> Is this Linus something that will eventually come on down to the Kirk Vanden-3/4/1999
5817 There's no PCI design flaw. The only thing is that 320/540 take only the 3Eli Lauris-3/3/1999
5816 To me, putting out a product with restricted compatibility is a colosal screw uThomas A Watson-3/3/1999
5815 Thanks...That's why I was trying to say DonDon Green-3/3/1999
5814 > Let a non tekkie ask some of you sharp young tekkies a question. > Is hmbsandman-3/3/1999
5813 A U.S. trade panel ruled on Tuesday for a second time that supercomputers impoDon Green-3/3/1999
5812 NOPE regards Don Don Green-3/3/1999
5811 Let a non tekkie ask some of you sharp young tekkies a question. Is this Linusdd-3/3/1999
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):