SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
IPIC
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1359 13 0 IPIC
Emcee:  David D. Long Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
684 Larry, don't waste your time... You're using logic and facts against psds-9/18/1997
683 How do you explain biotechs as: CNTO, IMNX, AGPH, GLFD, GILD, INCY, MEDI, etc.,Larry Liebman-9/18/1997
682 Still believe that 16 is the bottom.John R. Sashko-9/18/1997
681 Sky is not falling but IPIC is fall from above $40 to under $14.Haolin Ni-9/17/1997
680 << If it was a good deal at 20 it's a steal at 13. I'll probably WeirdPro Randy-9/17/1997
679 . . .One final comment regarding shortsellers. I have some difficulty in underHumbleHarv-9/17/1997
678 Yeah. Such a deal. If it was a good deal at 20 it's a <i>steal</Thomas C. White-9/17/1997
677 While I certainly take no pleasure in the extreme discomfort that longterm stocHumbleHarv-9/17/1997
676 "all those people panic-selling IPIC, like haolin, who claim the sky'sThomas C. White-9/17/1997
675 I never understood short sellers like this haolin character. One thing's foTodd D. Wiener-9/17/1997
674 Excuse me? You have the temerity to criticize one of the thread participants fThomas C. White-9/17/1997
673 Don't you think those analysts have fool you long enough to post that sort Haolin Ni-9/17/1997
672 "why bother specualting on the price" Why bother investing? How do yernie de la fuente-9/17/1997
671 Any ideas on how this will affect the FDA and it's approval process? Afterernie de la fuente-9/17/1997
670 < the FDA may still try to punish them for this> For what? There was noTed Downs-9/17/1997
669 From Motley Fool on DLJ release today: <<Alex To of DLJ just issued the WeirdPro Randy-9/17/1997
668 Thanks for your detailed report. It's nice to have someone blow away a litThomas C. White-9/17/1997
667 <<AHP apparently was aware of some case reports of valvular damage in MarWeirdPro Randy-9/17/1997
666 Liability issues... The legal fights over this should get interesting. First, sds-9/17/1997
665 I have had a flood of inquiries, so I decided to post my current thinking aboutNeuroInvestment-9/17/1997
664 Jack, < I have approached this as a pure speculation > I have been inTed Downs-9/17/1997
663 "Until then it is not safe to own this stock..." I suppose that to mThomas C. White-9/17/1997
662 This will probably be my last input for quite a while as I've already sJack Ryan-9/17/1997
661 I agree with Thomas White on liabilitiy issues and see today's carnage as pWeirdPro Randy-9/17/1997
660 There is logic and there is logic. You can have a serious debate aboJack Ryan-9/17/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News