SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1894 6 0
Emcee:  Iceberg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
69 Herb, you said >>I think that we do need other views as well .<< OGottfried-4/1/1997
68 Iceberg , Re: Understanding the other person's viewpoint I met a fellow tHerb Fuller-4/1/1997
67 All, Ice said >> might have gotten a little ahead of the game in offeringGottfried-4/1/1997
66 RE: exchange2000.com Interesting post but not one of the types we are tryingStan Walker-4/1/1997
65 Re: Controlling the contents of the thread. . . . . . Wally, personally, I belStan Walker-4/1/1997
64 >the next step should be to discuss appropriate responses to the various typIceberg-4/1/1997
63 >Re : controlling the contents of the thread - one can do that? wally, Iceberg-4/1/1997
62 RE: Classification of Problem Posters type I -- irritating, counterproductiveStan Walker-4/1/1997
61 >I like your intent and will continue to contribute. Gottfried, I'Iceberg-4/1/1997
60 >Freedom of speech will be maintained - but not freedom to insult, intentionIceberg-4/1/1997
59 To All: Here is an intriguing post for discussion purposes... exchange2000.coIceberg-4/1/1997
58 Wally, nice to meet you here. You said >>Re : controlling the contents ofGottfried-4/1/1997
57 Re : controlling the contents of the thread - one can do that ?? Or only thwally hieslmair-4/1/1997
56 Ice, you said >>My intent is to pass on whatever we learn on this thread Gottfried-3/31/1997
55 >the small group here will know how to react. How about the others? GottfriIceberg-3/31/1997
54 Ice, I concede your work on classification - with a response outlined for everyGottfried-3/31/1997
53 Herb, this is useful! You said >>momentum players will see a trend and bGottfried-3/31/1997
52 >May I suggest you also test prospective contributors for their understandinIceberg-3/31/1997
51 Gottfried, Re: Opinion's of others, Re: >>>> My key point was:Herb Fuller-3/31/1997
50 >there is nothing wrong with posting a hunch, as long as it is clearly identIceberg-3/31/1997
49 Ice, you said >> The three proposed classifcations are basically levels oGottfried-3/31/1997
48 >answer with the facts instead of criticising the poster Herb, I'Iceberg-3/31/1997
47 >The type of post I had in mind for the Type I was the "you're an iIceberg-3/31/1997
46 Herb, actually I don't trade either. I do like to hear the opinions of thosGottfried-3/31/1997
45 Gottfried, Re: The use of hunches when it comes to investing . Re: >>>Herb Fuller-3/31/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):