SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (HGSI)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1127 105 0 HGSI
Emcee:  Jeffrey Ogbar Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
77 I do believe that HGSI has been profitable recently do to roylaty income. DaviDavid Bogdanoff-3/4/1997
76 It seems to me the market is uneasy about valuation of both HGSI and INCY, but Boyce Burge-3/4/1997
75 HGSI mainly wants to be a drug company and use the genomic info to cure diseaseRocketman-3/4/1997
74 Thanks for the comments. I believe this is an important consideration relativeTroll_29-3/2/1997
73 The questions you ask regarding patents would really take an expert to answer. David Bogdanoff-3/2/1997
72 The recent understanding between the US and various other countries regarding pTroll_29-3/2/1997
71 Very interesting article on HGSI in the April, 1966, issue 0f Individual InvestDavid Bogdanoff-3/2/1997
70 Troll, I don't know whether you are correct or not but I will find out. On Vector1-3/2/1997
69 Vector: I understand the Clinton Administration cut or eliminated funding for Troll_29-3/2/1997
68 Miles, its no great secret that investment banks try to price secondary offerinVector1-3/1/1997
67 Brokers may have a vested interested to slightly under-price a NEW issue, but wMiles Rhyne Hoffman, CFA-3/1/1997
66 Depends on the price the shares go out at and the return the company generates Vector1-2/28/1997
65 will the 3m share offering dilute the value of the shares currently outstandingkas1-2/28/1997
64 Thanks for the clarification Boyce. I wonder why Merck should be so generous aDavid Bogdanoff-2/28/1997
63 The ESTs are just the partial sequences of genes that everyone makes from mRNABoyce Burge-2/28/1997
62 Thanks for the explanation. What exactly are ESTs that U Washington are makingDavid Bogdanoff-2/28/1997
61 It seems to me the point is that genes are only patentable if you can describe Boyce Burge-2/27/1997
60 Amen to full testing. Inadequate testing is a chronic weak point for startup bDavid Bogdanoff-2/27/1997
59 My point was that I do not believe the people on this thread who assert that thTroll_29-2/26/1997
58 HGSI has patents filed on over 200 cDNA sequences and accounts fo 20% of all geVector1-2/26/1997
57 Even if their database became obsolete, would that reduce the value of their paTroll_29-2/25/1997
56 Why would the U of Washington study make hgsi's database obsolete. There wDavid Bogdanoff-2/25/1997
55 Thanks for the info! - JeffFIFO_kid2-2/25/1997
54 i heard an offhand comment that merck is funding a univeristy of washington stukas1-2/25/1997
53 This thread needs to be revived !! This is the ONLY initial stage company I caFIFO_kid2-2/25/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):