SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Zeev's Turnips
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
644 39 0
Emcee:  Pink Minion Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
94The law I was relying on was Title IX, Chapter 102.112: <i> Deadline for sCarl R.-11/18/2000
93<ot>Well, Carl, this is very confusing, you stated, <i> As I stated Bosco-11/17/2000
92Hi Carl - if the Supreme Court is to reverse the ruling, the dems have to presenBosco-11/17/2000
91I agree. I would change my odds from 70% Gore to about 60% Bush at this point. Carl R.-11/17/2000
90Hi Carl - at this point, it looks like we would have a higher probability of havBosco-11/17/2000
89On another subject, the Florida judge has ruled that Harris's decision standCarl R.-11/17/2000
88<ot>Hi Carl - while I share the view against dimple and pregnant type chadBosco-11/17/2000
87Zeev, there seems to be little doubt that chads can be loosened by handling, andCarl R.-11/17/2000
86Regarding Nixon and the 1960 election, an interesting article. It does appear tZakrosian-11/17/2000
85<ot>Hi Carl - yes, I think the fall out [literally :)] is subject to invesBosco-11/17/2000
84Carl, if indeed those chads can be loosened up by handling, I doubt that only &qZeev Hed-11/17/2000
83One more thought regarding the chads on the floor, as it pertains to the accuracCarl R.-11/17/2000
82<ot>Hi Carl - re: chad on floor, I ve no idea who is right or what is wronBosco-11/17/2000
81I'll have to grant you that I haven't followed Daley's career, and ICarl R.-11/16/2000
80<ot>Hi Carl - evidently, President Carter agrees with me :) cnn.com but Bosco-11/16/2000
79<ot>Hi Carl - 1st, there are constant references, implicit or blatant, in Bosco-11/16/2000
78Re: your first post, obviously it was unrealistic for the Republicans to expect Carl R.-11/16/2000
77<ot>Hi Carl - I ve said this is politics all along, but you are absolutelyBosco-11/16/2000
76There is a fine line between having a reasonable way of resolving such disputes Carl R.-11/15/2000
75<b> HEY, THIS IS THE TURNIP THREAD. LET'S TALK TURNIPS, DAMN IT!!!!!!Pink Minion-11/14/2000
74Hi Carl - just some random musing on your last 2 posts. You are right b/c the ceBosco-11/14/2000
73You are quite right that there would be tremendous money to be made from hackingCarl R.-11/14/2000
72Zeev, I wasn't referring to Democrats as "pigs", and I'm sorryCarl R.-11/14/2000
71Hi Mark - re: <ot> probably not [since people in this thread seem to be grBosco-11/13/2000
70Bosco, Yes, the voting system could stand to be much improved. I think the intMark Ivan-11/13/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News