SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9433Hey, how come Karen doesn't get on your case for partisanship?Lazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9432Put 'em up!Lazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9431The data is suspect. I do not agree with the interpretation of suspect data. Jjlallen-4/17/2002
9430Yessum. Mail me some. Better Living Through Chemistry.Lazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9429It's simple: You asked to drop the conversation about any stepping-over-the-Poet-4/17/2002
9428Don't knock it till you've tried it, Bub. Might help you with that partPoet-4/17/2002
9427<i>Still scratching that itch, huh?</i> You didn't respond to mLane3-4/17/2002
9426LOL!! Does Prozac help with this?Lazarus_Long-4/17/2002
942530 years ago. Slick Willie was slamming America in a foreign country while the Lazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9424Against a cartel of companies plotting to dominate a market government interventTimF-4/17/2002
9423ROFL!!! (that's two l's, though. -g)Poet-4/17/2002
9422Still scratching that itch, huh?Poet-4/17/2002
9421Message 17343208 siliconinvestor.comE-4/17/2002
9420Good article, jcky. I basically agree with the Court on this one.Lazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9419Ohhhhh. That's a riot. OK, you win the daily round. First prize in levityPoet-4/17/2002
9418<i> Give the perverts some harmless ersatz and at least it might prevent tLazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9417'SOK. I liked your link, whether anyone else did or not. So you and I can Lazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9416<i>No appreciation for thread colour. Sheesh!!!</i> But really, I sE-4/17/2002
9415Good one.E-4/17/2002
9414There is no doubt that when someone wishes to use public lands, the impact and cNeocon-4/17/2002
9413What was I comparing (in your mind)? I was making a statement and not making a cosmicforce-4/17/2002
9412<i>endless intrusiveness</i> Too much of the interaction with commonTigerPaw-4/17/2002
9411<i>If you care to discuss this further, why don't you address that poiLane3-4/17/2002
9410You are stretching matters to the breaking point. That is like someone's parNeocon-4/17/2002
9409<i>And the government becomes the referee when the players are not asking TigerPaw-4/17/2002
9408Who cares? You are comparing apples to oranges. No comparison. JLAjlallen-4/17/2002
9407April 17, 2002 Judge Rules in Favor of Oregon's Assisted Suicide Law By THE Lane3-4/17/2002
9406The "something" I had in mind was more like "AIDS is not the scouJ. C. Dithers-4/17/2002
9405Oh yeah, using your DAD's office is so much better. Did you actually look atcosmicforce-4/17/2002
9404Eh? That would be Felatio Alger, not Horatio Alger.cosmicforce-4/17/2002
9403<i>You are the kind of people who'd go to a 50 cent movie theater <Lane3-4/17/2002
9402Message 17343138one_less-4/17/2002
9401<i>Cop out. </i> I would rather accomplish my goal than win a bet aLane3-4/17/2002
9400Sounds like you've got a bad case of penis envy to me....jlallen-4/17/2002
9399Do you have TP's inane anti Bush global conspiracy one liners on ignore?jlallen-4/17/2002
9398<i> When dealing with the common welfare, the government should be acting TimF-4/17/2002
9397<i>I think in general I do not start food-fights</i> My own observaLane3-4/17/2002
9396You don't need a relationship. Just reply to the post and push the submit bjlallen-4/17/2002
9395Every body was posting links that I could not relate to. And there was no responone_less-4/17/2002
9394Yes. I thought you were talking steel tariffs in the first part of your post. Njlallen-4/17/2002
9393What the heck is that link about? -gPoet-4/17/2002
9392No misconduct while President and not while using the power of his office... Bijlallen-4/17/2002
9391I understand and empathize...jlallen-4/17/2002
9390nstaff.sunyerie.eduone_less-4/17/2002
9389<i>AIDS is overwhelmingly a male homosexual disease primarily spread by seLane3-4/17/2002
9388You might find this interesting, on the connection between child pornography andPoet-4/17/2002
9387I guess Dubya reminds me of the heroes of Horatio Alger stories, but without thecosmicforce-4/17/2002
9386Sorry, JLA, I seem to be having a severe identity crisis right at the moment. Lazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9385Message 17343453 That's pretty good. Took care of three pinheads with one pLazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9384<i>The government is a monopoly and its allowed to use force to implement TigerPaw-4/17/2002
9383Message 17343208 As Mulder used to say, "The truth is out there."cosmicforce-4/17/2002
9382Message 17343453Lazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9381Be sure and let me know when you have anything of any possible significance to sLazarus_Long-4/17/2002
9380<i>I have JLAs innane one liners on ignore so I'm not sure what you arthames_sider-4/17/2002
9379Worse, a combination of #3 and #8. With the general attitude of #2. <w>thames_sider-4/17/2002
9378<i>Were your ears ringing?</i> At first I thought you were talking aTigerPaw-4/17/2002
9377<i>"Whether in movies or photographs, it doesn't make a differencthames_sider-4/17/2002
9376<i> You should re-read the way the commons works. Common resources and freTimF-4/17/2002
9375No, he uses his family name and influence to do that... Let me guess! You are cosmicforce-4/17/2002
9374<i>"endless inane petty, partisan rantings on this particular board..one_less-4/17/2002
9373Great question to generate a new topic. <i>"Yes, you are so right abone_less-4/17/2002
9372The statement of mine that is "just too much for you" was: <i>TJ. C. Dithers-4/17/2002
9371Hi jcky, About the virtual child porn SC decision, you'd said <I> IPoet-4/17/2002
9370The answer to the trade deficit problem is competition, not regulation.Dayuhan-4/17/2002
9369Trade Deficit Widens to $31.5B By Jeannine Aversa Associated Press Writer WednLane3-4/17/2002
9368Yes, you are so right about that Steven. But I don't see how doing the righjcky-4/17/2002
9367Were your ears ringing? Message 17342752Lane3-4/17/2002
9366I think if you go strictly by the interpretation of the law, the Supreme Court wjcky-4/17/2002
9365<i> I don't see much debate here among rational thinking adults. <Dayuhan-4/17/2002
9364<i>I thought Laz was thread sheriff????? </i> Yes, but I put on my Lane3-4/17/2002
9363<i>I responded to your post on the steel tariffs.</i> I didn't Dayuhan-4/17/2002
9362"My point exactly." <g> JLAjlallen-4/17/2002
9361Laz <I>is</I> thread sheriff.Poet-4/17/2002
9360If I had a nickel for every time I've done that, I'd be rich. -g What Poet-4/17/2002
9359No problem. Crap happens....<g>jlallen-4/17/2002
9358I thought Laz was thread sheriff????? I'm perfectly willing to drop the eljlallen-4/17/2002
9357Ooops... Thanks Poet. Slow day, I guess.jcky-4/17/2002
9356Message 17342329Poet-4/17/2002
9355Law Aimed At 'Virtual' Child Porn Overturned High Court Calls Ban Too Bjcky-4/17/2002
9354<i>But Aunt K, you're wanting to curb the very soul and witlessness ofLane3-4/17/2002
9353Do you think a statement like that from someone who doesn't post here would Poet-4/17/2002
9352< I want to talk about the impact of developed-world protectionism on developjcky-4/17/2002
9351<i>Hey, Laz, don't encourage them. </i> But Aunt K, you're Justin C-4/17/2002
9350Oh. my apologies.Poet-4/17/2002
9349I'm afraid there wasn't a point that related to my post, my dear.... Mejlallen-4/17/2002
9348As a matter of fact, I responded to your post on the steel tariffs. I doubt thejlallen-4/17/2002
9347<i>That's a lot of sugar and bananas.</i> First we lend them moDayuhan-4/17/2002
9346<i>I would really like to know the source on that figure, and how it was gLane3-4/17/2002
9345My point exactly.Poet-4/17/2002
9344I want to talk about the impact of developed-world protectionism on developing eDayuhan-4/17/2002
9343April 17, 2002 <B>'Virtual' Child Pornography Ban Overturned</BPoet-4/17/2002
9342I know you do. Just pulling your chain this fine morning. :-)Poet-4/17/2002
9341I would love to find out where the <i>Economist</i> came up with thaDayuhan-4/17/2002
9340I have many substantive issues with the Clinton crime family. I was just responjlallen-4/17/2002
9339Gee, and all this time I thought you Clinton-haters might've had some substaPoet-4/17/2002
9338Oh. My. Goodness. What a disturbing statement by Will.Poet-4/17/2002
9337Proof? Where's the proof? Do you ever have any proof? Or is your insane rjlallen-4/17/2002
9336He''s too late. Clinton has already claimed that prize. He threw his Pjlallen-4/17/2002
9335Sorry. You need to get over it sore/loserman. Bush won the election under the jlallen-4/17/2002
9334Who cares? Its not like he's lying under oath, lying to federal judges, obsjlallen-4/17/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):