SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Sound Off - Speak Your Mind
An SI Board Since April 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
595 8 0
Emcee:  HairBall Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
95IMO, all the funny business in the futures movement during the election process Casaubon-11/8/2000
94OK--We'll try it your way first. This will require a hostile take over of tflatsville-11/8/2000
93You're right. LG is untouchable. And I'm with you about the taxes. BuNo Mo Mo-11/8/2000
92<i>If he comes down on the wrong side, we'll switch our facilities oveflatsville-11/8/2000
91LOL!!! Maybe Aunt Grace could land herself a position in the Revenue Service. No Mo Mo-11/8/2000
90I lived in a brewery ward for a while...Come from a long line of bootleggers...Mflatsville-11/8/2000
89I'll agree to dissolving the social welfare programs if all tax deductions aCasaubon-11/7/2000
88LOL Well...here is as good a place as any. And, despite what LG says about booNo Mo Mo-11/7/2000
87<i>To extrapolate the current income tax laws to the private sector would flatsville-11/7/2000
86<i>"You think like a criminal."</i> Ahhhhhh....there'No Mo Mo-11/7/2000
85ROTFLMAO <i>However, if all the revenue for the Federal Govt. depended onflatsville-11/7/2000
84<i>You see...on the surface, I believe we need to be very careful with salflatsville-11/7/2000
83No Mo Mo: Frankly, those list are already in place for most areas. Look at your HairBall-11/7/2000
82LG- I agree, completing the list on SI is beyond our capabilities. In a way, tNo Mo Mo-11/7/2000
81No Mo Mo: I was trying to say, you nor I can complete the list on SI. Sure witHairBall-11/7/2000
80LG Utopia? <gg> Regards, Eichlereichler-11/7/2000
79LG- <i>"Sure, but first let me say more thought than I will put intoNo Mo Mo-11/7/2000
78eichler: A consumption tax would be to easy...<g> Think about it, pay as HairBall-11/7/2000
77No Mo Mo: <i>You did say some items would be "non-taxable", corrHairBall-11/7/2000
76LG... One more try. You did say some items would be "non-taxable", cNo Mo Mo-11/7/2000
75No Mo Mo: When I spoke of luxury items to flats, I was speaking in example. A FoHairBall-11/7/2000
74LG- Seems we may have a little breakdown in communication here. To Flatsville No Mo Mo-11/7/2000
73Les Horowitz: I see a twist on a quote from my profile...LOL Regards, LGHairBall-11/7/2000
72flatsville: Surely you do not think corporations do not contribute to Democrats,HairBall-11/7/2000
71<i>No man soars too high if he soars on the confiscated income of others. Les H-11/7/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):