SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Pluvia vs. Westergaard
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1267 13 0
Emcee:  JEFF CHAPMAN Type:  Unmoderated
This must be the most ludicrous thing I've ever seen on the internet. I believe all of us in the SI community should stand behind Pulvia, regardless of how we feel about Premier Laser, as this slanderous attack is aimed directly at the investor's ability to get or give their views on stocks, something only recently with the evolution of the internet, we've been able to do. Don't let companies like Premier or Westergaard remove that right!

jc

Here's the link to the 'bounty' that Westergaard has put out on Pulvia

westergaard.com
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1267update on Westergaard John loses suit by SEC sec.gov John plans to bash the Smmmary-11/2/2001
1266From today's SEC Digest: SEC SETTLES INTERNET TOUTING CASE AGAINST JOHN WESArcane Lore-10/17/2001
1265SEC judgement against westergaard US District Court Civil Docket US District mmmary-8/24/2001
1264update to westergaard site mary.cc check out his faxes. He explains his tactimmmary-5/4/2001
1263New WSJ story on Westergaard's SEC problems public.wsj.com Longtime SecuriJohn Biddle-5/4/2001
1262Westergaard speaks John just can't shut up. Here's a fax he's sendimmmary-2/2/2001
1261York Times article about the SEC suit mary.cc Lots more info. about John Westemmmary-1/23/2001
1260From yesterday's SEC Digest: SEC NAMES WESTERGAARD, TWO ENTITIES IN INTERNEArcane Lore-12/28/2000
1259 www.wired.com article mentions Westergaard in unrelated news. Some guy threatenastyanax-7/5/1999
1258 Humbly report, Scrapps, as you wish: epicenter.geology.uiowa.edu And humbly wJosef Svejk-5/4/1999
1257 Say good night...GOOD NIGHT JOSEF! Scrapps-5/4/1999
1256lacky.com tscn.com lacky.comJosef Svejk-5/4/1999
1255 Westergaard.com's Web-based Micro-Portal to Wall Street Begins BroadcastingScrapps-5/4/1999
1254 Mori&#151don't know if you still read SI, but just in case: magneticdiBill Ulrich-12/15/1998
1253 In response this morning to a poster commenting he would have expected Premier Westergaard-11/2/1998
1252 Humbly report, Kevin, I see what you mean - #reply-6117190 . Oh, and note theJosef Svejk-10/26/1998
1251 Humbly respond, Joseph, as long as JW wishes it were true, that seems to be goHoatzin-10/26/1998
1250 Humbly report, Kevin, guess we can kiss the satellites good bye, huh? If he cJosef Svejk-10/26/1998
1249 <b>WESTERGAARD TO REPLACE GLENN IN SPACE LAUNCH</b> Cape Payola, FHoatzin-10/26/1998
1248 Humbly report, JW, I see you've been burning midnight oil trying to cleanJosef Svejk-10/25/1998
1247 For what I hope is the denouement of the Pluvia vs. Westergaard matter, GO TO tWestergaard-10/25/1998
1246 The following item will be published Monday morning at wbn.com announcing aWestergaard-9/26/1998
1245 We know nothing about HEB. Please go to www.wbn.com and click on "About wbWestergaard-9/11/1998
1244 I suppose if senseless personal attack, rather than clarity of presentation in Q.-9/10/1998
1243 My Dear Sir: God help The University of Iowa -- where you claim to serveWestergaard-9/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):