Nasdaq planning clampdown on Internet rumours

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Nasdaq planning clampdown on Internet rumours

An SI Board Since September 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
250	6	0

Emcee: Done, gone.	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

biz.yahoo.com

"The Nasdaq stock market in the United States is to introduce a
new surveillance device to hunt out price-sensitive false information on the Internet..."

"The new Nasdaq device, due to be installed by the end of the year, will track some 4,000 Nasdaq-listed companies, searching for price-sensitive information which has not been officially released."

"It will focus on so-called ``chat-rooms'' on the global network of computers, looking for false information that could move share prices.

Nasdaq has spent between $1 million and $2 million on the initial cost of the device."

Thorough discussion of this matter seems urgent.

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
250	Humbly report, a cablegram dated 1897 just dropped through the FBN mail slot. A	Josef Svejk	-	11/25/1997
249	Czech Bounced-Czech Bounced? or Bounced-Czech Bounced Back? You wrote: >Wel	Black Dahlia	-	11/25/1997
248	<b>Silicon Investor Tops 100 Million Page Views Per Month, Launches Aggre	Done, gone.	-	10/20/1997
247	Well, I'd say we're the Svejks, and NASDAQ is the Empire thinking they	Done, gone.	-	10/6/1997
246	re "Svejik" Checked your links (except the academic comparison with K	Joe E.	-	10/6/1997
245	Joe, >> re your quote from "The Good Soldier Svejk": I hope t	Done, gone.	-	10/4/1997
244	Jeff, Jill, >> express my <i>hope</i> that Mad Monk, Y2Kste	Done, gone.	-	10/3/1997
243	Woops, the "double post" was not intentional! (end) - Jeff	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	10/3/1997
242	Re: Clarification of SI's Criteria for Booting Someone Recently, another n	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	10/3/1997
241	Re: Clarification of SI's Criteria for Booting Someone Recently, another n	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	10/3/1997
240	Joe, >> Michal, re your quote from "The Good Soldier Svejk":	Done, gone.	-	10/2/1997
239	Michal, re your quote from "The Good Soldier Svejk": I hope the illu	Joe E.	-	10/2/1997
238	Jeff, Just reading this here book you may be interested in, written by Jarosla	Done, gone.	-	9/30/1997
237	I posted to this thread because I objected to someone requesting the ouster of	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	9/30/1997
236	What's that have to do with this thread? I fail to see the relationship, un	Riley G	-	9/30/1997
235	I responded to your post here: techstocks.com - Jeff	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	9/30/1997
234	In response to your mentioned attacks upon me: Read this. It matches my convers	Riley G	-	9/29/1997
233	Well, another naysayer gets canned on SI-- Droog. I've followed this guy	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	9/29/1997
232	Joe E. >> Sure, lets all sue each other. Good idea. << Bad idea	Done, gone.	-	9/24/1997
231	Dear Michael: My point is that under our system there need be no reason to com	Joe E.	-	9/24/1997
230	Joe E., >> Re your post with this P. S.: "An addition to the secon	Done, gone.	-	9/24/1997
229	Re your post with this P. S.: "An addition to the second post: I believe t	Joe E.	-	9/24/1997
228	My views on lawsuits against net forum posters: exchange2000.com exchange2000.	Done, gone.	-	9/21/1997
227	Michal, <<<We'll program it with a list of all Nasdaq companies a	Cisco	-	9/20/1997
226	Thanks Michal. Good articles there. I agree a lot on MrB's - Educate bette	Mr. Jens Tingleff	-	9/20/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):