RMIL SHAREHOLDERS THREAD | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
RMIL SHAREHOLDERS THREAD

An SI Board Since March 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
23	5	0

Emcee: Pugs	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

As of today, 3/7/98, RMIL shareholders have roughly 2MM shares in certificate form. The float is 2.17MM shares and RMIL shareholders have 3.3MM shares called for.
RMIL is merging with RMCW to make RMCW a publically traded co. in a reverse merger of a small publically traded company with a larger private company. The merger will be completed when RMIL recieves a$10MM cash infusion which RMCW has stated will be finalized by the end of March.
RMIL has completed its part of the 15c2-11's and MM's are doing their DD, when that is completed, the NASD will inform RMIL when it can trade again on the OTC BB.
In the interim, because of the large naked short position, the RMIL thread has been taken over by shareshakers who appear to be working on behalf of RMIL shortsellers. This is, after all, a non-trading BB stock . One shareshaker ,in particular, has declared that even though RMIL satisfied SEC demands with their 8K and a 10 day trading halt expired uneventfully, he was present on the RMIL thread to "punish" the co.. Of course the company he refers to is OVIS, which no longer exists, RMIL shareholders contend that this shareshaker, and the others in his 'group' are here to only shake shares on behalf of RMIL shortsellers.
Doing DD on the shareshakers in this group reveal that they have a history of posting on S.I. on threads with stocks which have a large short position or possible squeeze, they only post to slam the company, tank our investment and to shake shares for the large naked short position held by RMIL shortsellers.
They will slander and defame anyone who gets in their way. They will post ad nauseum on a thread for a non-trading BB stock, some of them have a history of posting under numerous monickers like MM's have been known to do, some will post anonymously with no EMail address, without the fear of retribution.
Shortsellers of RMIL have put out FRADULENT press releases about the company, they have hired employees , AND ADMITTED SO, to slam RMIL on the RMIL thread.
Now the gauntlet has been tossed, the shareshakers have posted their intent, they are here to "punish" us!!!
RMIL shareholders have taken out an insurance policy on their investment, We have DEMANDED OUR SHARESIN CERTIFICATE FORM!!! The only way to combat the abusive practice of ILLEGAL NAKED UNDECLARED SHORTING IS BY GETTING YOUR SHARES IN CERTIFICATE FORM!!!
This thread is intended for RMIL shareholders to have a forum to discuss their investment and the short squeeze without the relentless slamming and misinformation of RMIL shortsellers monopolizing the thread!!!
SOLIDARITY!!!!

Pugs

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
23	X-Sender: XXXXXXXXXX Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 12:00:34 -0500 To: (Recipient list	Ellen	-	2/16/1999
22	Was this a Mark Schultz special? If so go here to vent. Many other peop	Augustus Gloop	-	6/16/1998
21	>>>>>>>>>>>Private Message To: Pugs From: mi	Pugs	-	3/12/1998
20	I meant to respond to PUGS and RILEY. The market gurus.	MJ	-	3/11/1998
19	Except for the post you're responding to, MZUBOZ's last post concerning	Arcane Lore	-	3/11/1998
18	This is total bs. last week you announced that you spoke with a woman from rmil	MJ	-	3/11/1998
17	To all: IOFSMIO(In the opinion of former shareholder and mostly impartial obse	MZUBOZ	-	3/10/1998
16	Daddy: From Pugs' response it seems that management has answered those que	KMT	-	3/10/1998
15	Pugs: You can't hold management to anything they tell you over the phone.	KMT	-	3/10/1998
14	Pugs, Could you please provide your audience a proper definition of &quo	Hawkmoon	-	3/10/1998
13	Good Man Paul!! I fully understand how it feels to have your company halted an	Hawkmoon	-	3/10/1998
12	Go Daddy Go, your on the right track and I hope your fellow shareholders band t	Ditchdigger	-	3/10/1998
11	Garry, My father has nothing to do with this! I'm tired of the same old run	MY OPINION	-	3/10/1998
10	Paul, With all respect, Today I gave you Puhrs phone number, call him. Noth	Pugs	-	3/10/1998
9	No, all i get is the same old......any day now.....sooon....this week...any tim	MY OPINION	-	3/10/1998
8	Daddy: Thanks for your honest post. Any luck in calling a shareholders meetin	KMT	-	3/9/1998
7	" And again, I would like to know WHY RMIL SHAREHOLDERS AREN'T	MY OPINION	-	3/9/1998
6	Y'know Pugs, You promised to answer any of our questions once smartin	Hawkmoon	-	3/9/1998
5	Thanks Pug for the boxing comments. I was in the video store today and saw WHE	freelyhovering	-	3/9/1998
4	Myron, Even those cretin shareshakers can see the amount of 'satire'	Pugs	-	3/9/1998
3	Pugs--Good idea for a thread without the naysayers. Myron	freelyhovering	-	3/9/1998
2	>>>>>And I think we all know who the fool is around here. It is	Pugs	-	3/9/1998
1	Pugs like it good job. joey.	joseph krinsky	-	3/7/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):