Paradigm Technology(PRDM) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Paradigm Technology(PRDM)

An SI Board Since February 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
259	5	0	PRDM

Emcee: Jim Tao	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Anyone noticed this stock? They designs, manufactures, and markets
high speed, high density SRAM semiconductor devices to meet the need
of telecommunications, networks, workstations, high performance PCs...etc.

They are a niche products company recently secured their wafer supplies
with Atmel and NKK and have their own Fab. Some analyst just upgrade it
to strong buy and traded at 10 times of projected 96 earnings.

They looks different than other SRAM companies like ALSC, IDTI, ISSI
and CY while all the other companies are traded at a p/e around 7 to 8.
It still has a p/e of 17.

Anyone has more information/insight on this one please share.

Regards!

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
259	Okay, John. I was going to ask Jill to change the name/symbol on THIS thread so	Linda Kaplan	-	10/6/1998
258	Linda, Since there was no thread on SYXI, I just started one. Come on over an	John Carson	-	10/6/1998
257	Never mind. I found it. New company name IXYS. New symbol: SYXI. Linda	Linda Kaplan	-	9/29/1998
256	Anyone: Does this stock have a new symbol? Thanks. Linda	Linda Kaplan	-	9/29/1998
255	Darn! And I was hoping they'd all go hungry and have no place to live. Act	James H. Williams	-	9/11/1998
254	James, I guess some people are saved in spite of cynical d***s like you!!!!	Rodney Doan	-	9/11/1998
253	Rodney, Thanks for your comment. I agree that without a merger the value of P	Ed S	-	8/30/1998
252	Susan, You are mistaken about comparing the 15-1 rev split ($~12) and anything	Rodney Doan	-	8/30/1998
251	I think (as I have said just recently) that it comes down to a simple math prob	James H. Williams	-	8/29/1998
250	Take a good long look at this chart ... it is worth a pittance now from a qua	Susan Saline	-	8/29/1998
249	you voted yes? <b>to another reverse split???</b> even though it	Susan Saline	-	8/29/1998
248	I also am a PRDM shareholder (unfortunately) who has nothing to do with PRDM or	Ed S	-	8/29/1998
247	Susan, I am beginning to see your point. Always appreciate your comments. Than	Sandra	-	8/27/1998
246	I'll look for mine and I will vote. Linda	Linda Kaplan	-	8/27/1998
245	>>> So, when my new materials arrive, I will dutifully vote "no&q	Susan Saline	-	8/27/1998
244	Hurrah, Susan...you confirm my two major points: a) the only people who will l	James H. Williams	-	8/27/1998
243	At this point ... I can only go from past experience with mergers ... The last	Susan Saline	-	8/27/1998
242	Susan, I havent followed this issue at all.. would it be in the shareholders be	Sandra	-	8/27/1998
241	I wouldn't vote for it see SENS .... used to trade .15 cents to .50 fairly	Susan Saline	-	8/27/1998
240	Linda, I agree and am in this stock for the same reasons! The company had calle	Sandra	-	8/27/1998
239	Man, is this place a crypt or what? The other thing I forgot to mention (and my	James H. Williams	-	8/25/1998
238	I think you've hit the heart of the matter exactly. I never said I make NO	James H. Williams	-	8/24/1998
237	Cool. I am sure the sailors on the RMS Titanic were doing their jobs too. Most	Rodney Doan	-	8/24/1998
236	If it was my job I was talking about and I had collected a salary while driving	James H. Williams	-	8/23/1998
235	To bad it isn't your job you are talking about. You would probably feel di	Rodney Doan	-	8/21/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):