SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
AMERica on-Line, Another over valued company?
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
222 0 0 AOL
Emcee:  Bob Wang Type:  Unmoderated
AMER claim they will be a Billion dollar company this year.
AMER is the leading on-line service provider, with large customer
base.

Extremly high PE. Just like netscape.

Facing ATT on-line service competition, Compuserve and Prodigy.

Do you think the days are numbered ??
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
222 Andy; I shouldn't have used the word dumb, I know many intelligent people wJames F. Hopkins-4/10/1999
221 I'm a fairly intelligent person. My family enjoys the AOL experience. We Andy-4/10/1999
220 LOL; AOL; That Steve Case could sell sand to Arabs , the service still suks butJames F. Hopkins-4/9/1999
219 I guess now most everyone realizes how undervalued AOL is!Duane Greg-4/9/1999
218 No one posted to this thread since 96 ?James F. Hopkins-9/9/1998
217 The Old thread is dead but makes good readingJames F. Hopkins-9/9/1998
216 i ccant belive this thread is still hereJames F. Hopkins-9/9/1998
215 Free? Remember you still have to pay in terms of lousy service, poor interface Zoltan!-10/1/1996
214 Free is better than cheap...free aol. If you call to cancel you're aol accomiller-8/13/1996
213 Art, make that a loss of (.23) vice (.38) You are correct in that my assumptionJeff Olson-8/13/1996
212 Your calculations seem basically correct to me. There are a few other factors Art Stone-8/12/1996
211 Your calculation doesn't make any sense: heavy users should be less than Jingsheng Sun-8/12/1996
210 Jeff thanks for the calcs I am assuming that the $3,666,667 in other costs areRichard Query-8/12/1996
209 AOL will lose (.38) a share next quarter ... All things being equal (i.e numberJeff Olson-8/12/1996
208 Intel sale in North America only accounts for 40%. How about the other 60%? IJingsheng Sun-8/11/1996
207 AOL is focusing on growth not profit, basically AOL has enough money to make waJingsheng Sun-8/11/1996
206 << $240 per new user, that's wrong. AOL added 700,000 - 800,000 new uArt Stone-8/11/1996
205 $240 per new user, that's wrong. AOL added 700,000 - 800,000 new users lasJingsheng Sun-8/10/1996
204 Wrongo. I am very precise in the use of words and everything I stated is true Zoltan!-8/10/1996
203 1)America Offline's churn rate is now up to 50%. More cancel afteJingsheng Sun-8/10/1996
202 Go to the Motley Fool in AOL and you can read a summary of the conference callJames Knight-8/9/1996
201 To all, Can aol's conference call be listened by dialing some number ? DoeSameer Apte-8/9/1996
200 How's this just in from WSJ: ''Conversion from trial (use) has decZoltan!-8/9/1996
199 30 cents not only is an insult to customers it also equals 10% of AOLs net forRichard Query-8/9/1996
198 WSJ reports today that: 1)America Offline's churn rate is now up to 50%. MZoltan!-8/9/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):