SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Impeach and convict are not the same word.
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
26 0 0
Emcee:  Solomon Type:  Unmoderated
I'm tired of hearing people continue to say that Mr. Clinton's wrongdoing "doesn't rise to the level of impeachment". It did, indeed, rise to that level. He has been impeached. There can no longer be any argument as to whether it rises to that level. It would be much like stating that the Mississippi River didn't rise to flood level in 1993. That argument is over. The salient argument now is whether, after being impeached, Mr. Clinton should be convicted and removed from office.

What I'm curious about now is where these people are who are giving him a favorability rating of over 70%. Even the Democrats in both houses of Congress are calling him bad names. You don't say things like reprehensible, inexcusable, unforgiveable, disgusting, etc. about someone you like. I hear people say they don't think he should be removed from office, but almost none who have a favorable opinion of him. Who is conducting these polls, and whom are they polling?
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
26 No! Geller should be taken out and shot as he RAPED hundreds of investors and Fhcm1943-12/31/1998
25 hcm, you talking about Laurence Geller? eom. etc. Intrepid1-12/31/1998
24 Solomon, I must first point out I am a Canadian and old enough to remembeThe Osprey-12/30/1998
23 This Tony Snow column about Clinton and impeachment is interesting - especiallyWren-12/30/1998
22 Thanks for the candid and polite reply, Christopher. It seems that so many peoRose Rose-12/30/1998
21 hcm1943, Thanks for the post from another thread. It tells it like it is. Wren-12/30/1998
20 <<Even regular polls show a hardcore of one-third of the public that wantmark silvers-12/30/1998
19 THIS POS DOES NOT DESERVE THE OFFICE OR THE FAVOR OF THE PEOPLE: READ THIS FROMhcm1943-12/30/1998
18 Solomon, thanks for posting the analysis of polling. I certainly have turned dWren-12/30/1998
17 This was on another thread. It should be required reading. THURSDAY Solomon-12/30/1998
16 <I><<He did not lie, he misled.>></I> Ha! Good one. BuBill-12/30/1998
15 etc- You wrote: "Polls being polls it still is hard to ignore the FACT thMana-12/30/1998
14 Your right. It is a matter of opinion. I just don't agree with yours. HoweMana-12/30/1998
13 <<Clinton should stay in office because he was elected by the majority ofWren-12/30/1998
12 >><i>My opinion is also that removing him from office would only huBob Lao-Tse-12/30/1998
11 <<In all seriousness, why do you think this man should stay in office?>Intrepid1-12/30/1998
10 I'm sorry, Christopher, but I cannot agree with your assessment that "Rose Rose-12/29/1998
9 If BC was an ordinary citizen who committed multiple sexual harassment actions,Wren-12/29/1998
8 What question or questions do the polls ask? Someone on one thread said he wasWren-12/29/1998
7 Rose- In all seriousness, why do you think this man should stay in office? EverMana-12/29/1998
6 Polls validity are in serious question. I don't know many of my friends whoR. Martenson-12/29/1998
5 To be honest, I haven't seen that much support for the president except forMana-12/28/1998
4 They should test the drinking water for it s lead content in southern Californichartseer-12/28/1998
3 Some of us (those who do not want Clinton removed) reside in Southern CaliforniRose Rose-12/28/1998
2 I'm still curious as to where this majority who don't want Clinton remoSolomon-12/28/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):