SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
BORL: Time to BUY!
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10836 19 0 BORL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10136 Now you can see why I was skeptical about BORL's pre-earnings rally. Just Ghassan I. Ghandour-4/23/1998
10135 <i>All this rhetoric about what Borland was is worthless relative to wherDavid Miller-4/23/1998
10134 Rod, Re: >"it's not a stock a shareholder could be happy about owniTTOSBT-4/23/1998
10133 Thanks Sam the 19 did look high - as you point out it is at the higher end of tshane forbes-4/23/1998
10132 Sam: RE: <i>I've never heard that consensus estimates reflectshane forbes-4/23/1998
10131 Mark: The 37 million is LAST YEAR'S BORL sales for the March Q! NOT THIS Yshane forbes-4/23/1998
10130 Thanks for the link, Mark. What a good news. Life is good. Jeff and Brad deserBipin Prasad-4/23/1998
10129 Mark, I also read the following article and saw the 37 million reported sales: Dennis Nicks-4/23/1998
10128 BPP - Did you see what our friends at SI just did!!! techstocks.comMarc Slovak-4/23/1998
10127 Part of the problem is they keep coming up with one-time charges so it's tuKashish King-4/23/1998
10126 Amazing how so many positive accomplishments relative to the turnaround and repEdward F. Horst Jr.-4/23/1998
10125 <i>I can't recall but how does the 19 mil. compare with the estimatesSam Scrutchins-4/23/1998
10124 <i>- more light on the boneheaded earnings release - such as did we or diSam Scrutchins-4/23/1998
10123 In techweb.com it was said "Borland reported first quarter sales of $46.5 Mark Bracey-4/23/1998
10122 Mark: RE: <i>Where the VSGN number accounted for 9M, a 2M increase over lshane forbes-4/23/1998
10121 David: What they said they'll explain: - new strategic vision now that theshane forbes-4/23/1998
10120 Gene: BORL could surely have used some of those "Viagra"esque salesshane forbes-4/23/1998
10119 Russell, Re: >"his article makes it look really bad for BORL. What happTTOSBT-4/23/1998
10118fnews.yahoo.com Apr 22, 1998 (6:13 PM ET) - The Motley Fool Evening News ....Russell McGuire-4/23/1998
10117 Gene, Re: >"You need the patience of Jobe when investing in Borland.<TTOSBT-4/22/1998
10116 Today's move was in sympathy with CNTR which also lost 10%. Borland will goKashish King-4/22/1998
10115 <i> It is the question how quickly and securely the company can change iti-node-4/22/1998
10114 Charles: "I was a buyer today at 10." Me, too. Sat through a day ofivan solotaroff-4/22/1998
10113 <i>the coincidence that BORL's numbers would add to that 1 penny is hDavid Miller-4/22/1998
10112 In a quarter where they (and everyone else) knew they were going to have a lossMark Bracey-4/22/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News