SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10518I'll make one quick comment on what Grover said: The points he brings up ReBEEF JERKEY-6/6/2002
10517telecomguy, are you reselling VoIP minutes on your international routes? Also, wFrank A. Coluccio-6/6/2002
10516I typed this out fast while listening to interview but I think it hits the high BEEF JERKEY-6/6/2002
10515Telecomguy: Good questions. <i>"Doesn't WCOM have to pay the John Curtis-6/6/2002
10514do you have a text version? I don't have a speaker in my PC....telecomguy-6/6/2002
10513<i> Like I said in my earlier post, anything wireless seems to lose money.tejek-6/6/2002
10512<i>Hmmm....I thought for long time Ebbers & WCOM believed that the wirpaul t-6/6/2002
10511The voice of reason is back! Vic Grover offer's view on recent developmentsBEEF JERKEY-6/6/2002
10510<I>they are not making money for the PRECISE reason that they all paid fortejek-6/6/2002
10509Maybe they should sell off the MCIT which is a mature business and likely to contelecomguy-6/6/2002
10508Hmmm....I thought for long time Ebbers & WCOM believed that the wireless spatelecomguy-6/6/2002
10507Businesses sell profitable divisions all the time. Surprisingly, buyers are usuaOeconomicus-6/6/2002
10506That would be peanuts in terms of overall cost. I think they are just trying totelecomguy-6/6/2002
10505heheehe....that would do the job.telecomguy-6/6/2002
10504Does the wireless division include the fixed wireless? If so, they have investeGale-6/6/2002
10503<i> There is no way WCOM could be losing money on their wireless resell diRono-6/6/2002
10502they are not making money for the PRECISE reason that they all paid for their litelecomguy-6/6/2002
10501WCOM up nearly 5% on heavy volume. I guess those institutions you showed on Thomtejek-6/6/2002
10500<i>Either Wcom was managing their wireless resell operation quite badly ortejek-6/6/2002
10499No, I AM really a Telecomguy...been in telecom business (PBX, network switching telecomguy-6/6/2002
10498It's no different than selling competitive local service, except that they tOeconomicus-6/6/2002
10497<i>1) Doesn't Wcom have to pay the RBOC's for the "last mile tejek-6/6/2002
10496I own/run a swichless reselling operation in Europe which is extremely competititelecomguy-6/6/2002
10495Unlimited Local/Reginonal/Long Distance calling? Couple of questions: 1) Doesntelecomguy-6/6/2002
10494Good question. You'd think they'd make the money on the markup on each cRock_nj-6/6/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News