SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
RGFX Raster Graphics
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
593 4 0 RGFX
Emcee:  darren_ Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
143 Both. Hi Sam. RasterGraphics is going for the Print-for-Pay segment, which isDavid Barton-8/1/1997
142 William, RE: IP Protection I spoke with CEO Rak Kumar on this issue. He told mSam Citron-8/1/1997
141 David, I agree. And welcome to the thread. You sound like you know quite a bitSam Citron-8/1/1997
140 The bottom just fell out of 6.75 on the bid side. Currently 6.625/7. Could bedarren_-8/1/1997
139 Thanks for the input Sam. It does look attractive. I'm tempted to go for myWilliam Douglas-8/1/1997
138 I have a product idea that hit me last night. I'm going to submit it to thdarren_-8/1/1997
137 I have a few ideas on why the stock hasn't performed yet, based on my own cDavid Barton-8/1/1997
136 William, Excellent question. There certainly are some troubling similarities. Sam Citron-8/1/1997
135 Im long on RGFX, but I cant seem to understand why, after all these record breailan saadia-7/31/1997
134 If there is money in it I'm sure it's only a matter of time. On the othWilliam Douglas-7/31/1997
133 Darren, I believe there is mention in the 10K about developing more products iJeff Lawlor-7/31/1997
132 William, <Why won't one or more of them eat their lunch?> Based on Fred Fahmy-7/31/1997
131 In short, they are two small companies going "toe to toe" with other William Douglas-7/31/1997
130 If the activity on this thread is any measure, a few of us are waking up to RGFRichard Haugland-7/31/1997
129 Welcome! It's good to see some interest finally. Janice Benedict at IR isdarren_-7/31/1997
128 Bill, How can you compare a company that is trading at 5x book value and is loFred Fahmy-7/31/1997
127 Sam - I can see you like this one and I have much respect for your opinions. HoWilliam Douglas-7/31/1997
126 Hi Darren and ALL: I'm in today at 7 1/8. I appreciate all the information greenspirit-7/31/1997
125 On a technical note.... RGFX is missing an important opportunity that I hope thDavid Barton-7/31/1997
124 Good observation and I completely agree. It's all about market awareness anDavid Barton-7/31/1997
123 Yes, you are right about Encad - I have been looking at the company recently (idarren_-7/31/1997
122 Darren, I'm not sure what you mean when you say that Encad doesn't getDavid Barton-7/30/1997
121 I believe that someone is accumulating the stock at 6 3/4. I had no problems fdarren_-7/30/1997
120 Although this stock repeatedly touches 6 3/4 on the sales, it appears to clearlRichard Haugland-7/30/1997
119 Analysts will probably hold off until after the next earnings report but I feeldarren_-7/30/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News