SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTC
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
990 16 0 INTC
Emcee:  Jules B. Garfunkel Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
165 Also, INTC has a greater % ownership by institutions. Some, like Fido Magellan Frodo Baxter-4/11/1997
164 I finally read most of the 10-K. Particularly interested in how the company invFrodo Baxter-4/11/1997
163 The points you bring up regarding relative floats and PE is exactly why I deal Reginald Middleton-4/10/1997
162 Reginald & Xstuckey - Re: Intel & Microsoft P/E Valuations One item whPaul Engel-4/10/1997
161 <I think P/E is also awarded on the basis of gross profit. If it isn't, Reginald Middleton-4/10/1997
160 <I just finished an article in Financial World which graphically showed MSFTReginald Middleton-4/10/1997
159 Hi Harry, I have seen the Intc P/E vs Msft P/E issue raised many times withoutxstuckey-4/10/1997
158 Re: your, <<How about "We make more $ per computer sold than they doHarry Landsiedel-4/10/1997
157 greg, It is obvous that the Intel employees were still in a Holliday mode and tJules B. Garfunkel-4/9/1997
156 Lawrence, As you, or some of the older SI followers may remember, I was fortunaJules B. Garfunkel-4/9/1997
155 Paul: re "That means Intel nearly matched AMD's earnings on January 2exhon2004-4/9/1997
154 Harry, Thank you for bringing the Fortune article to our attention. As you knowJules B. Garfunkel-4/9/1997
153 >IMHO that meeting did more to change analysts' perceptions about Intel Frodo Baxter-4/9/1997
152 Re: Intel Presentations. I believe that the New York Analysts' Meeting in Harry Landsiedel-4/9/1997
151 Re: Andy Neff. I have followed Mr. Neff for quite some time, as Bear Stearns iHarry Landsiedel-4/9/1997
150 Nice Thread. Re: IBM. Jules: Have you seen the Fortune article on IBM? pathHarry Landsiedel-4/8/1997
149 Paul, That is quite an impressive comparison or should I say Amd is miniscule cFrank Ellis Morris-4/8/1997
148 Good point that does put it in perspective.Now lets work on getting it done befrobert w fain-4/8/1997
147 Jules - Good to "hear" from you, too! AMD posted Q1 earnings (!) yesPaul Engel-4/8/1997
146 I knew I had the Intel price cuts somewhere... techweb.com Note how the 166Frodo Baxter-4/4/1997
145 Paul, Glad to see you over here. I have been traveling for the last three weeksJules B. Garfunkel-4/3/1997
144 Paul, welcome back. You have certainly made up for lost time. The K6 is indeedFrodo Baxter-4/3/1997
143 Burt - Windows NT K6/Pentium Pro Test Results Tom Pabst from Germany - sysdocPaul Engel-4/3/1997
142 Revenues are difficult to predict. The model (this is an absurd oversimplificatReginald Middleton-4/2/1997
141 Reginald - Does the analysis show the stock price at 400% higher or the revenueBurt Masnick-4/2/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News