SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17733Nice editorial and I agree about Ashcroft's emerging pattern of hype, then nPoet-7/18/2002
17732LOL! A true patriot...jlallen-7/18/2002
17731yep.jlallen-7/18/2002
17730Typical demolib media type smear....jlallen-7/18/2002
17729Here's a little something for the Ashcroft "fans" in the crowd. SLane3-7/18/2002
17728Hi Ish, I'm sorry to see you go, will miss you here. I wish you all the besPoet-7/18/2002
17727Well, at least it's thinking. Beats what some people around here are doing.Bill-7/18/2002
17726Exactly.....jlallen-7/18/2002
17725Truly offensive <LOL>.Bill Grant-7/18/2002
17724<i>They either exonerated him or they failed to do their duty. There is noLane3-7/18/2002
17723The 144 is a public notification that the insider intends to sell. When I see a Bill-7/18/2002
17722They either exonerated him or they failed to do their duty. There is no in-betweBill-7/18/2002
17721Bush filed his 144. This is all a bunch of politcial garbage. The transactiojlallen-7/18/2002
17720<i>Bull. It was as much an exoneration as a person could get. 100%.</i&Lane3-7/18/2002
17719Bull. It was as much an exoneration as a person could get. 100%. The rest is juBill-7/18/2002
17718<i>Or are you excusing the entire SEC staff which exonerated Bush, even ifLane3-7/18/2002
17717You're like a broken record. Bush is clean and you can't stand it. Now Bill-7/18/2002
17716Obstruction of Justice for starters. Or are you excusing the entire SEC staff whBill-7/18/2002
17715Probably not, but it depends on the case. Each case is different, you know. TraBill-7/18/2002
17714I woke up this morning to a report on local news that the US Postal Service has Lane3-7/18/2002
17713Thanks. But did you have to send it to him? <g> Yes...definitely leave oSolon-7/18/2002
17712<i>Wouldn't you agree, Mr. Moderate? </i> Yeah. Except for one Lazarus_Long-7/18/2002
17711I remember looking at earlier versions of that in the late '90s and wonderinLazarus_Long-7/18/2002
17710EDITLazarus_Long-7/18/2002
17709You are REALLY enjoying this, aren't you? Wait until we get another Dem prLazarus_Long-7/18/2002
17708The answer to this question would settle the matter, one way or the other. >&E-7/17/2002
17707No slightly moderated here- Subject 53158Ish-7/17/2002
17706Yes, he's a very smart and very nice dood, I agree.E-7/17/2002
17705There are many cases in which death is not enough. Listing the horrors perpetratE-7/17/2002
17704<i>This is like blame a bunch of alcoholics for getting drunk when the corOriginal Mad Dog-7/17/2002
17703I like the way OMD thinks, don't you?Poet-7/17/2002
17702what you said.E-7/17/2002
17701I haven't given much thought to whether the SEC violated any laws. What statE-7/17/2002
17700Hoooooly....... You trying to ruin my night? :-) We're paying property taxPoet-7/17/2002
17699And then lay the Dow runup from 1995 to 2000 onto a chart from 1930: cpcug.org Lazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17698That was classic. Where do you come up with these goodies?Poet-7/17/2002
17697You Can Glue Your Hair Together to Repair Scalp Wounds Researchers may have foE-7/17/2002
17696"Again" in the case of the ones who've killed. The number of indivE-7/17/2002
17695And I remember someone saying you were biased towards the bullish side! :-) HoLazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17694Clinton wanted the credit for the good. He gets the blame for the bad. Fair&#Lazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17693Clinton wanted the credit for the good. He gets the blame for the bad. Fair&#Lazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17692It doesn't seem nice to disagree with you right after you agreed with me. TMichael M-7/17/2002
17691Let's see. Put OMD into humor challenged pile also. Have to cut you in haLazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17690Har de har har Do you know how to remove hairball scuck from shoes, BTW?Poet-7/17/2002
17689LOL!! Excellent....jlallen-7/17/2002
17688:-) Member 4021405Bill-7/17/2002
17687Incredibly comprehensive article. Laz, thanks for pointing it out to me. I needPoet-7/17/2002
17686You and I are definitely on the same page! :-)Bill-7/17/2002
17685I'll be right there, alexed. I've been out all day.Poet-7/17/2002
17684LOL! I'm making that my motto!!jlallen-7/17/2002
17683Actually, my target on the SPX is more like 750Jorj X Mckie-7/17/2002
17682Ah, your labels don't bother me Mr. Long.....they are like most people'sOriginal Mad Dog-7/17/2002
17681Speaking of money supply, check this out: Message 17752476 <i>Clinton ranLazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17680Just in case you're feeling too good. :-) financialsense.com Look at the Lazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17679If a post doesn't offend someone, somewhere, what good is it?Bill-7/17/2002
17678Hey, fire away. We would. :-)Lazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17677Yes,with quickness! I don't like deleting posts,because I really believe inalexed-7/17/2002
17676White? Hell no! Can't see up the dress unless they're black... - gBill-7/17/2002
17675patent leather shiny shoes.... are they white? more importantly... are you weMulhollandDrive-7/17/2002
17674I do indeed. At least I didn't soil my shoes. The patent leather is still aBill-7/17/2002
17673What an awful thing to say. I hope you at least feel better after coughing that MulhollandDrive-7/17/2002
17672Would you like a bit of milk with your toast?Bill-7/17/2002
17671Hello Poet, I need your judgement on a post to me.Should it stay or go?The rednalexed-7/17/2002
17670Dynamite piece, Solon. Far out! I posted that link to Evile on the GWB thread.Lazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17669The Mariah Carey quote was on the same list as the Bush/Clinto/Gore etc quotes. E-7/17/2002
17668Thank you, Neo. I love good quotes! And isn't religious freedom great! AlSolon-7/17/2002
17667<i>Do you think Clinton had much to do with the Great Bubble?</i> NOriginal Mad Dog-7/17/2002
17666<i>If using that line makes a President a poseur, liar, fool, or ignoramusLazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17665The unstated charge is that the SEC Enforcement staff are criminals. They gave BBill-7/17/2002
17664Very good New Republic piece. Audit This. You get the idea. But there's a loE-7/17/2002
17663Hitchins certainly had a full head of steam up when he wrote that. However, he Lazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17662<i>"Are you better off than you were four years ago?" Remember tOriginal Mad Dog-7/17/2002
17661Mad dogs and Englishmen come out in the midday sun.Bill Grant-7/17/2002
17660Yes, but... they'll never kill again.Bill-7/17/2002
17659First Inaugural Address George Washington (Thursday, April 30, 1789: New York CNeocon-7/17/2002
17658Sometimes I post to you even if it has nothing to do with your post, don't aE-7/17/2002
17657I agree with that post of yours, too. (Putting aside the new Spy On Your NeighboE-7/17/2002
17656<i>IMO, we need biometric ID cards (with strict limitations on what informE-7/17/2002
17655Every president attempts to take credit for good times. Bush is only guilty of E-7/17/2002
17654That's like saying that Babe Ruth and Bill Vaughn were both baseball playersBill-7/17/2002
17653Very! Message 17746300Bill-7/17/2002
17652Perhaps I didn't express myself clearly enough. Clinton got the flack that hBill-7/17/2002
17651Bill thinks it's one of the stupidest ideas he's ever heard. Ashcroft haBill-7/17/2002
17650Please tell me that Mariah Carey blurb is a joke. Please.Poet-7/17/2002
17649Hi E, We adopted my daughter as a very young infant. Her biological mother tooPoet-7/17/2002
17648Whatever happens, don't worry about Ashcroft seizing the moment - he doesn&#Michael M-7/17/2002
17647Someday, when Clinton and Bush have faced the judge and jury of history and beenDayuhan-7/17/2002
17646<i>Others of similar persuasion have had the same wet dreams. Not gonna haDayuhan-7/17/2002
17645<i>You can say that more economically: he was a politician.</i> Yes.Lazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17644<i>it also means Clinton was a poseur, a liar, a fool, or an ignoramus. &lDayuhan-7/17/2002
17643What amazes me is that they ever believed otherwise. Something like that is cleLazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17642I expect here won't be that much opposition- -until it's too late. TheyLazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17641What's that got to do with my post? :-) You love playing offense, don'Lazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17640Others of similar persuasion have had the same wet dreams. Not gonna happen. WMichael M-7/17/2002
17639<i>I must ask you, Steven, what "higher ambitions" could AshcrofDayuhan-7/17/2002
17638That can't possibly be for real... but I have this awful feeling that it proDayuhan-7/17/2002
17637This program is too amateurish for words. It rightly deserves ridicule and scorMichael M-7/17/2002
17636Uh, Slick Willie was just <i>delighted</i> to take credit for that bLazarus_Long-7/17/2002
17635Didn't the shares fall over the next few months to slightly more than a quarE-7/17/2002
17634I was going to look for some post blaming Clinton for the recent corporate scandE-7/17/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):