SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17933They got a million dollar grant from USDA to fix things, it seems. EDIT: This Lane3-7/20/2002
17932<<I think Ish and numerous others would object to your scheme. :-) >>Ish-7/20/2002
17931The ban on outdoor smoking was here in Ruidoso. I hadn't heard about TombstoTom Clarke-7/20/2002
17930Well, know you know why he wasn't elected President! :-) I think Ish and nLazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17929Message 17768153 Message 17768208Lazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17928Oh, but E <i>loves</i> ten year old charges! What else are those HLazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17927<i>Since the thread is now the Weekly World News of Politics......</i&gLane3-7/20/2002
17926<i>we should cut the country in half at the Mississippi and sink the East.Lane3-7/20/2002
17925Since the thread is now the Weekly World News of Politics....... :-) Why hasn&Lazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17924I edited my post: <i>Former US Senator Barry Goldwater (R-Arizona) said duLazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17923Enjoy! :-)Lazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17922<i> It used to be that Drs. nationwide told their sever asthma patients toLane3-7/20/2002
17921I was born and raised in Tucson. It used to be that Drs. nationwide told theirLazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17920impose? I fail to see that they will be forced to use the services. Over populLazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17919Well, as long as we're airing ancient dirty laundry, we might as well get itLazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17918Surprise, surprise, surprise! More innuendo and insinuations! BUT NO MORE <Lazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17917And now for something completely different: science is studying the G spot: <E-7/20/2002
17916Are you suggesting that something about the Kennedy's behavior in ChappaquidE-7/20/2002
17915Sounds to me like at the very least mansaughter, and quite possibly 2nd degree mLazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17914Mary Jo Kopechne didn't drown, she suffocated with her face in the air pockeE-7/20/2002
17913I fail to see what responsibility the American taxpayer has towards the reproducaverage joe-7/20/2002
17912Playing politics in a way guaranteed to cause suffering. It's horrible.E-7/20/2002
17911As I recall, Kennedy did claim to have made some attempt to rescue Kopechne. SLazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17910Yep. It's also interesting that the first people he talked to after the aDayuhan-7/20/2002
17909I'm glad to hear that you're enjoying your vacation. I didn't know Lane3-7/20/2002
17908Didn't spend too much time in Tucson. Spent a lot more time points south. NoTom Clarke-7/20/2002
17907Kennedy has no integrity and he lied. ytedk.comaverage joe-7/20/2002
17906Family Planning Funds Withheld Administration Decides Not to Contribute to U.N.Lane3-7/20/2002
17905My take on that one: I think he'd been drinking, and that he was probably nDayuhan-7/20/2002
17904Surprise surprise!......... "Soros adds to doubts on Bush business deals E-7/20/2002
17903And also that Bush....E-7/20/2002
17902Who could argue with that?E-7/20/2002
17901OK. YOU give him the presumption of innocence. :-) Actually, the two situatioLazarus_Long-7/20/2002
17900Chappaquidick may not be mentioned. Responsible Government agencies investigateDayuhan-7/19/2002
17899Mention of the truth and Oliver North in the same post deserves a hearty LOL.Dayuhan-7/19/2002
17898It came from a white water paddling message board. You don't want to go theDayuhan-7/19/2002
17897Your comparison of Bush's unstellar resume and business improprieties to KenE-7/19/2002
17896Message 17759138 Message 17759185Lazarus_Long-7/19/2002
17895<i>Notwithstanding your mischaracterization of what I think about the SEC Lane3-7/19/2002
17894I sense that since you are a champion of President Bush, the mention of ChappaquE-7/19/2002
17893<i>I have to start getting to bed earlier: </i> Right. Like that&#Lazarus_Long-7/19/2002
17892<i>Of course there aren't very many people I do think deserve to be trLazarus_Long-7/19/2002
17891The truth: Oliver North July 19, 2002 The politics of corruption WASHINGTON,jlallen-7/19/2002
17890Excellent piece..... Let the Investigations Begin Lynn Woolley Friday, July jlallen-7/19/2002
17889Pssst.... It's the 33rd anniversary of Chappaquoiddick. Plus one day. :-)Lazarus_Long-7/19/2002
17888<i>Clinton had the people's and the country's interest in mind<jlallen-7/19/2002
17887<i> fundamentally Clinton had the people's and the country's intLazarus_Long-7/19/2002
17886<I><< The investigation that was done was suitable for the purpose aBill-7/19/2002
17885<i>I feel it's fair to blame Clinton for everything</i> You mayTigerPaw-7/19/2002
17884OK. You may have the last word. I'm spent.Lane3-7/19/2002
17883Oh. Well. You seem intent on blaming Bush for everything, so I feel it's faLazarus_Long-7/19/2002
17882<i>"One doesn't "believe" "facts." Facts justone_less-7/19/2002
17881Totally off base. An investigation determines if there is probable cause to makjlallen-7/19/2002
17880Pretty much agree. These things are products of bull markets... and the largerLazarus_Long-7/19/2002
17879<i>part of the reason for having an investigation/prosecution function is Lane3-7/19/2002
17878<i>I'm sure you've seen word of Moussaoui's latest antics. I&#Lane3-7/19/2002
17877<i>You're splitting hairs....</i> I guess in a way I am. We Lane3-7/19/2002
17876It's past blaming today's fiasco on any bubble. washingtonpost.com The TigerPaw-7/19/2002
17875Well, it made me laugh. People are funny. Where did you get that?E-7/19/2002
17874Prescription for Stock Market Death Spiral. 1. Elect Slick WIllie 2. Have SlickLazarus_Long-7/19/2002
17873Just for fun: If 666 is the number of the beast then: 660 - Approximate numbeDayuhan-7/19/2002
17872<i>Clearly this is an issue of disagreement, not of explanation.</i>Lane3-7/19/2002
17871I disagree. I think the moral tone of the WH does make a difference. The fact jlallen-7/19/2002
17870If you're trying to tell me that the market boom and the financial shenanigaDayuhan-7/19/2002
17869Message 17761291 Message 17760900jlallen-7/19/2002
17868About that you are correct. I think the hangover from the Clinton years is justjlallen-7/19/2002
17867I actually have a lot of respect for a certain type of corporate executive. TheDayuhan-7/19/2002
17866Ack, I can't get anything from that post. I'm sorry.Poet-7/19/2002
17865Message 17761550jlallen-7/19/2002
17864I didn't think so either....jlallen-7/19/2002
17863it ain't working....MulhollandDrive-7/19/2002
17862I'm sure you've seen word of Moussaoui's latest antics. I'm stiPoet-7/19/2002
17861And if the identical situation had existed with Clinton, you would have defendedE-7/19/2002
17860I hate to ask, but I haven't been following too closely the last eighteen hoPoet-7/19/2002
17859Unfortunately, its an important principle....jlallen-7/19/2002
17858Good morning Hekyll and Jekyll <gg>, I don't understand why you all cPoet-7/19/2002
17857What a nice compliment. Thank you.Poet-7/19/2002
17856Prescription for Stock Market Death Spiral. On Monday the Fed bought enough stoTigerPaw-7/19/2002
17855I must admit that it does appear that way to me.....jlallen-7/19/2002
17854Really? Do you think Karen is that smug?Bill-7/19/2002
17853Yes. IMO, it is a most undemocratic posture if one truly believes in the rule ofjlallen-7/19/2002
17852<i>If someone disagrees with you, you post to other people, like JLA and Jjlallen-7/19/2002
17851People who make those charges and don't believe reports which clear the execBill-7/19/2002
17850I agree. We need people like P, regardless of political persuasion. (;>)Bill Grant-7/19/2002
17849Man. How do you ever get free of such charges once you become a director....parjlallen-7/19/2002
17848Didn't you know? In the world according to Rogers, every corporate exec is aBill-7/19/2002
17847He's either innocent or the SEC falsified or buried the investigation. NobodBill-7/19/2002
17846<i>anytime somebody makes a charge which can not be disproven to your satiDayuhan-7/19/2002
17845OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVEN'T READ THE REPORT. PLEASE DO SO BEFORE YOU POST ANOTHER Bill-7/19/2002
17844Bill doesn't need an arrogant ignoramus to explain documents he's alreadBill-7/19/2002
17843<I><< I just found this post of yours>></I> Hahaha. It Bill-7/19/2002
17842Sheesh, your attention span is nil. Sheesh.Bill-7/19/2002
17841Not.jlallen-7/19/2002
17840So then, anytime somebody makes a charge which can not be disproven to your satijlallen-7/19/2002
17839Thought a bit about this Bush thing today; I think this will be my last word on Dayuhan-7/19/2002
17838Hey, thanks for the recipe. My daughter LOVES lemonade....jlallen-7/19/2002
17837You're splitting hairs.... Bush starts with a presumption of innocence. Thejlallen-7/19/2002
17836<i>Fact: The SEC never talked to Bush</i> Not surprising considerinjlallen-7/19/2002
17835Glaciers 'melting faster' A study shows the rate ice is melting in AlaE-7/18/2002
17834<. Do you feel the same?> About what positions of his? He's not my SeE-7/18/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News