SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
AMERica on-Line, Another over valued company?
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
222 0 0 AOL
Emcee:  Bob Wang Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
22 Morgan Stanley is the investment banker for AMER. When AT&T announced entrvibaby-3/2/1996
21 Don't go picking on The Motley Fool if you've never been there. I'vBruce Brantman-3/2/1996
20 A few very good points indeed. You said "they're losing the proceeds Ed Zhao-3/1/1996
19 It's certainly possible for AOL management to respond to the marketplace chScott Maxwell-3/1/1996
18 The Motley Fools are apparently being scrutinized closely by the SEC at the momScott Maxwell-3/1/1996
17 The earnings are overstated but probably not by too much. The expenses deferredEd Zhao-3/1/1996
16 Now that giant ATT is in the picture -- with other giants to follow, I believe olduser-3/1/1996
15 The question is really whether their investment in subscribers and POPs is goinScott Maxwell-3/1/1996
14 The way I see it is that by amer capitalizing their cost to develop their subscRussell-3/1/1996
13 But AMER has clean financial sheet and positive cash flow. It's not risingEd Zhao-2/29/1996
12 Scott, thanks for the info on amer. I'm having my broker verify this today.Russell-2/29/1996
11 AOL *does* capitalize subscriber-acquisition costs, more so than any other provScott Maxwell-2/29/1996
10 Content is very important -- unfortunately AOL has not announced their plans foScott Maxwell-2/29/1996
9 Scott, Is AMER really capitalizing their cost to develop new subscribers? SoRussell-2/29/1996
8 Don't underestimate the importance of contents! But how many people reallyEd Zhao-2/28/1996
7 I also listened to the CNBC discussion and can confirm that Gary is correct. Scott Maxwell-2/28/1996
6 John Murphy DID NOT say that-I,ve watched CNBC all day. And your experience witGary Youree-2/28/1996
5 AMER - get out or lose your shirt. America online is another overvalued accessolduser-2/28/1996
4 I wouldn't get too excited about your ability to move markets -- the eye-opScott Maxwell-2/28/1996
3 WHOOPY!!! I got the bears going on AMER. I agree with AMER at 544 PE is going Bob Wang-2/28/1996
2 These things take time, but sea changes of investor opinion can whack a stock lScott Maxwell-2/27/1996
1 EDS dropped from 40 to 4 in the seventies. AOL is the EDS of the nineties. Juscapitalistbeatnik-2/27/1996
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News