SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42834 221 0
Emcee:  wooden ships Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
22482"<i>There is no need for me to answer your question to get you to ansMath Junkie-7/24/2006
22481"I don't put much stock in private evidence, because I figure if it'Kirk ©-7/24/2006
22480Math_junkie "I'll answer that question if you'll answer this one: fahrenheit451-7/24/2006
22479"<i>Why would I want to encourage someone who posts false informationMath Junkie-7/24/2006
22478Yes indeed Brinker may have been # 1 at some point on some criteria. With a scstockalot-7/24/2006
22477"<i>Bob Brinker was NOT rated number one in any category for any lengMath Junkie-7/24/2006
22476Now we are getting somewhere. So you are saying in addition to the fact that Bstockalot-7/24/2006
22475Willy don't you guys even read this stuff? Of course, Brinker's performshres-7/24/2006
22474Elan Quatro May be too late, but you might want to be a bit cautious about thatpeanut_butter-7/24/2006
22473I am beginning to suspect that there is no category in Hulbert's ratings thastockalot-7/24/2006
22472I did a search for "long-term stock market timing hulbert" and found tKirk ©-7/24/2006
22471"Marketimer currently is ranked number one for long-term stock market timinEQ -7/24/2006
22470Are you Acousins/geode? The person who got stung by the Brinker QQQQ trade, but Honey_Bee-7/24/2006
22469"Bob Brinker is rated number 12.45 by Dilbert for Portfolio 4 from Dec 18thshres-7/24/2006
22468Bob Brinker is rated number 12.45 by Dilbert for Portfolio 4 from Dec 18th 2004 pigstuff-7/24/2006
22467"...At one point he was making stuff up and posting things as facts they weshres-7/24/2006
22466elan quatro said: <<I may be able to offer insight into the latest Brinkedijaexyahoo-7/24/2006
22465Good job, Kirk setting the record straight...long overdue.Honey_Bee-7/24/2006
22464I agree that if you let him, Dija can suck up your time on minuetia like no oneHoney_Bee-7/24/2006
22463"I looked through that thread and couldn't find an instance of his callKirk ©-7/24/2006
22462Of course you are right. My bad! -g- I think what I was trying to say is you vKirk ©-7/24/2006
22461While trying his darndest to alibi for Brinker's claims of being the currentstockalot-7/23/2006
22460"If Hulbert, in his March newsletter, said brinker was #1 through Jan. 2006stockalot-7/23/2006
22459Elan Quatro...You will find Bob Brinker's exact words, from both the MarketiHoney_Bee-7/23/2006
22458Dija...Bob Brinker was NOT rated number one in any category for any length of tiHoney_Bee-7/23/2006
22457I may be able to offer insight into the latest Brinker claim. But, could someonEQ -7/23/2006
22456math said: <<I looked through that thread and couldn't find an instandijaexyahoo-7/23/2006
22455stockalot said: <<He told the caller. "We had to stop the newsletterdijaexyahoo-7/23/2006
22454Kirk, you are correct that Dija had tweaked you many times before he finally leHoney_Bee-7/23/2006
22453It was far more than one instance. After all, why would he keep making the offeKirk ©-7/23/2006
22452"<i>It is interesting to point this all out to you, your bud dale andMath Junkie-7/23/2006
22451"<i>He has stated that he NEVER gave individual stock recommendationsMath Junkie-7/23/2006
22450You seem to miss the point. Stockalot asked a question that was both on topic fKirk ©-7/23/2006
22449stockalot said "But since Queen and Math are interested and too lazy to looqueen90700-7/23/2006
22448"Now, can you tell us an out-and-out lie he has told in the newsletter or opigstuff-7/23/2006
22447"<i>But since Queen and Math are interested and too lazy to look it uMath Junkie-7/23/2006
22446"If it was me (was a subscriber but did not bite on the q call, would not epigstuff-7/23/2006
22445Justa's censored site. I honestly didn't recall the moments I spent stockalot-7/23/2006
22444OK, thanks for clarifying that. I know that we haven't shied away from calliMath Junkie-7/23/2006
22443Math, Just to be clear, my statement: "It was an extreme act of dishoneststockalot-7/23/2006
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News