SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
E4L, Inc. (NYSE: ETV)
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1080 9 0 ETV
Emcee:  Todd D. Wiener Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
280 John- Although the timeline seems problematic, NM could still be acquired befoTodd D. Wiener-10/21/1997
279 Todd, Interesting article. I like your analysis. What I'm concerned withJohn Arnopp-10/20/1997
278 Check out today's announcement by HSNI: biz.yahoo.com By merging with assTodd D. Wiener-10/20/1997
277 to all: as per my "PSYCLE sm" S.T. buy on NM @ 4 5/8, post # 232, on Jim Goodman-10/16/1997
276 John- The news leak or rumor that appeared last week has already prompted the Todd D. Wiener-10/16/1997
275 Todd, This week (weak) is turning out to be a lot less "interesting"John Arnopp-10/16/1997
274 John- If Cendant buys NM at $10 per share, that's ~$350 million. That'Todd D. Wiener-10/13/1997
273 Todd: Regarding CUC (Cendant) possibly being the party that will "enhanceJohn Arnopp-10/13/1997
272 Todd: I have to agree with you. I do think there will be some news, even if iJohn Arnopp-10/11/1997
271 John- The volume is not Safeguard. It's institutional buying. Dare I say iTodd D. Wiener-10/11/1997
270 Todd, Thanks for your sympathy. With such high volume, I don't think justJohn Arnopp-10/11/1997
269 I didn't buy it yet. I'm leaving my options open (sorry for the painfulTodd D. Wiener-10/11/1997
268 PS, Todd: Your slicer-dicer is on NM's web page now: quantumtv.com How dJohn Arnopp-10/11/1997
267 Todd: I'm so sad, but it could've been worse. I left a point on the tJohn Arnopp-10/11/1997
266 Hey John- Are you still holding those October calls? I hope you are, because yTodd D. Wiener-10/10/1997
265 NM looks very impressive. Volume is tremendous today, and the stock is almost uTodd D. Wiener-10/10/1997
264 Hi Todd, NM is penetrating above $6 now. Looks really health. hwtl-10/9/1997
263 NM looks much better right now, having just blasted thru the 50-day MA on very Todd D. Wiener-10/8/1997
262 John- It could be NM, but it didn't grow by 25% in 1994 and 1995. AnythingTodd D. Wiener-10/6/1997
261 Todd, does this sound like anyone we know?: diamtech.com Diamond Technology PJohn Arnopp-10/6/1997
260 I am long SNRS, quite a run up of late, very nice. What can you tell me about Duke-10/6/1997
259 value #shares who dates price NATIONAL MEDITodd D. Wiener-10/5/1997
258 Todd, I am also in the waiting mode. Could use the cash to invest in SNRS whicBARRY ALLEN-10/1/1997
257 John- This filing registers the common stock that would be issued if the 2 venTodd D. Wiener-10/1/1997
256 What say? PSYC-ic or PSYC-o? I'll take anything at this point. I think witJohn Arnopp-9/30/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News