SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Plasma and Materials Technologies !!!!
An SI Board Since December 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
383 3 0 TRKN
Emcee:  David Tesorero Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
308 Uri, vwi govoriti po engliski? Sorry, I don't have a Cyrillic keyboard. ARobert Henry-2/14/1997
307 Just a thought. lets say they are the best in the industry. wouldn't an inttaxikid-2/13/1997
306 Marty, if one FAB uses PMAT's technology and improves the chip preformance davesd-2/13/1997
305 PMAT's low k technology is interesting but so are several others. The inMarty Gymopski-2/13/1997
304 Andrew, I doubt PMAT is interested in being bought, insiders control over 50% odavesd-2/13/1997
303 Hello Robert, The PMAT news release is misleading. They say it self-planarizesuri vaughan cummings-2/13/1997
302 Since you mention AMAT, who lately seems to be in the acquisition business, whaAndrew H-2/13/1997
301 Dave, Thanks for your informative reply. will keep watching this thread for futEugene De Luz-2/13/1997
300 Eugene, in this industry you have to prove your products are production qualitydavesd-2/12/1997
299 Been reading this thread and watching the stock daily. If this process is bEugene De Luz-2/12/1997
298 Not to pick a quarrel, but the points you raised vis a vis that article can be sds-2/12/1997
297 A truly civil, intelligent, and reasoned response. Ted Quinn and Rod MacphersoAndrew H-2/12/1997
296 I appreciate the information and no offense taken by this subscriber. AdditionTim MacLean-2/12/1997
295 OK, I'll take my licks for being negative but in this case the "whole Mike Stills-2/12/1997
294 Perhaps it would be of benefit to this thread if your postings, be they negativTim MacLean-2/12/1997
293 Mike, since you are so sure of PMAT's demise and being as smart as you are.davesd-2/12/1997
292 I'm surprised this bit of "news" had such an impact on the currenMike Stills-2/11/1997
291 I appreciate the information and I plan on giving them a call as soon as possibTim MacLean-2/11/1997
290 Tim, inre to FPD, you might try talking w/PMT directly. I know they've beeRobert Henry-2/11/1997
289 John: If memory serves me, it was 3M. But it has been six month since I read abZeev Hed-2/11/1997
288 Techs bouncing big-time in London trading. If you bought PMAT yesterday looks John Grandy-2/11/1997
287 Robert, Zeev once again is looking for that cloud instead of the silver lining.Rick Hansen-2/11/1997
286 Just another point to consider. If I am not mistaken, hasn't PMAT been actiTim MacLean-2/11/1997
285 To all, from the Motley Fool "Heroes": "If the process works asRobert Henry-2/11/1997
284 John, which analysts didn't like the deal? I called a couple back before tRobert Henry-2/11/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News