SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Speedfam [SFAM] Lovers Unite !
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3736 43 0 SFAM
Emcee:  AJ Berger Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3436 wow, AMAT's on fire, giving SFAM a lift! I'll probably bail before earAJ Berger-7/6/1999
3435 AJ: I think I was the reason it closed under 17. I unloaded 4500 shares at 17 Ritz-7/2/1999
3434 Would be nice to close above $17 into the long weekend. AMAT seems to inspire AJ Berger-7/2/1999
3433 I don't know of any big orders, but I did hear of an expansion buy of 3 sysFLSTF97-7/1/1999
3432 If you really want to know the scoop on this cleaner stuff go over to the YahooLex Luther-6/30/1999
3431 Did anyone see SFAMs positive coverage on CNBC 2 weeks ago before the barrons AJ Berger-6/30/1999
3430 Not only that but the bit about the cleaner is dated (AMAT Mirra Mesa) and it sFLSTF97-6/28/1999
3429 Finally somebody who makes a positive statement about SFAM. But does he really wmf-6/26/1999
3428 This should get the stock moving: Scott Black's comments in Barron's RoSidney Street-6/26/1999
3427 This baby moves up 15% and there is only one post. Matt Quigley-6/10/1999
3426 Applied changes CMP playing field Competitors fight back by cutting costs andMort-6/9/1999
3425 CMP News semibiznews.comLogain Ablar-6/8/1999
3424 Nice mention of SFAM here messages.yahoo.com What about FSII, CPCL and SVGI tKirk ©-6/6/1999
3423 Relative to Slurriless and Yields, I've heard that at least two sites usingFLSTF97-6/3/1999
3422 Thanks Mr Sam. Kirk ©-6/2/1999
3421 <<Q: Why is it good to eliminate a slurry? Major cost savings or yield iMr. Sam-6/2/1999
3420 Interesting discussion...Glad to have some process experts here! Q: Why is itKirk ©-6/2/1999
3419 <<How does web-based polishing differ from the belt-type technology beinMr. Sam-6/2/1999
3418 How does web-based polishing differ from the belt-type technology being implemeRob-Chemist-6/1/1999
3417 I concur on the niche company/long backlog theory in general, but I believe thaFLSTF97-6/1/1999
3416 So... Let me see if I get this straight. SFAM went to $17 on its own as a valuaKirk ©-6/1/1999
3415 Mr. Sam Re: " I continue to believe that SpeedFam will be better off if itJusta Werkenstiff-5/31/1999
3414 SemiBull, I promised you a post regarding my take on the Obsidian purchase by AMr. Sam-5/31/1999
3413 <This should allow AMAT to lock up the IP on web format. You can assume thatSemiBull-5/31/1999
3412 I doubt that AMAT ever considered SFAM(They will probably have 65%-70% CMP markFLSTF97-5/31/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News