SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
SCTU - SC & T International Inc.
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
741 3 0 SCTU
Emcee:  zoei crisafulli Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
391 Mr K...Just thought of a couple things: 1. Did you see any equipment for electBill Rogers-4/19/1998
390 Mr K.....Good report, these are my concerns: 1. Cash....takes BIG bucks to advBill Rogers-4/19/1998
389 The one thing that bothers me is the small amount of stock the management team RONALD H. RUST-4/18/1998
388 What are you talking? When the Dog recommended SCTI, it was 0.16. Now 0.23, nJamessmith-4/18/1998
387 Concerning the reverse: The company needs shareholder approval before any reverwilliam Velmer-4/18/1998
386 Good Day to All: The reverse split is to be VOTED on. It's not necessarilMark Shantz-4/18/1998
385 You make a valid point sir, but my gut tells me otherwise. Weighing my options,Laz-4/18/1998
384 Come on, Laz! If you want to get out before the split drives the value down, yoJ Walter Jacobs-4/18/1998
383 The reverse split is being voted on (unconfirmed), and pumping the price beforeLaz-4/18/1998
382 Another perspective might be that the "news" was fabricated to pump uJ Walter Jacobs-4/18/1998
381 Appreciate the input you gave us of the meeting, but what still puzzles me is wLaz-4/17/1998
380 Regarding your post on the reverse split not being necessary. 1) My impressiMr. K-4/17/1998
379 Wow! Wished I would have read that before I bought the last five stocks I currMr. K-4/17/1998
378 Hi Mr K., Since you were so kind as to post a commentary of the stockholders mMichelle H.-4/17/1998
377 Mr. Valmer, If you have read my posts on the stockholder meeting I would appreMr. K-4/17/1998
376 I wouldn't get all worked up about the old products not being sold. I don&Mr. K-4/17/1998
375 Reverse splits are poison...good bye. Share price will drop and additional sharJ Walter Jacobs-4/17/1998
374 Mark, After looking over what Mr. K reported, I've got some concerns. 1) 5DuGen-4/17/1998
373 Mr. Copeland was asked why it was so important to be on the nasd small cap? (WhMr. K-4/17/1998
372 DuGen: I guess the third option(you know the one that wasn't mentioned by Mark Shantz-4/17/1998
371 Mr. K, thanks for the report. Thought you got 3 messages a day without joining?DuGen-4/17/1998
370 Mark, I sure do hope you are right and I am wrong. Welcome aboard and your opiDuGen-4/17/1998
369 I attended the meeting in Scottsdale yesterday, there were a hand full of stockMr. K-4/17/1998
368 Hello All I'm a first time poster so I hope you don't mind if I put myMark Shantz-4/17/1998
367 CW, is it just you and me? I've got every bell, whistle, and siren set to DuGen-4/17/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):