SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Zeev's Turnips
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
644 39 0
Emcee:  Pink Minion Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
394Zeev, Mathematical proof of existence is much weaker than the construction of tSBHX-12/16/2000
393Hi Zeev - I am a logical atomism challenged individual <vbg>, so I don'Bosco-12/16/2000
392Yup. ZeevZeev Hed-12/16/2000
391Actually I suppose it is technically still too early to say that your departure Carl R.-12/16/2000
390Carl, but if someone else did switch the light on for him, that was alright for Zeev Hed-12/16/2000
389Sad to say that even though I was only about 6 credit hours short I getting a maCarl R.-12/16/2000
388The well ordering theorem is proved by "negation" (assume there was noZeev Hed-12/15/2000
387If the axiom of choice was true, then it follows that the well ordering principlSBHX-12/15/2000
386Bosco, I am surprised that Russel's axiom of "choice" did not comeZeev Hed-12/15/2000
385<ot>Hi SbH - I am a fuzzy math individual <VBG>, 'WeltanschauungBosco-12/15/2000
384Bosco, Weltanschauung? If by that you mean a unified theory where everything iSBHX-12/15/2000
383<ot>Hi Carl - away from the *main topic*, what do you think of the recent Bosco-12/15/2000
382I also will cease posting on the subject. We have enough fertilizer here now to Carl R.-12/15/2000
381Probably my last post on the subject. A few postmortem thoughts. 1. judging froBosco-12/14/2000
380Hi Sam - thx for the article. Yes, I think those who have followed the USSC are Bosco-12/14/2000
379SbH I agree to a degree... But above all else I have learned not to assume. AMagnatizer-12/14/2000
378magnatizer, Your inference was very logical and may be correct in the end. I&#SBHX-12/14/2000
377Hi Bosco, Here is yet another article on the "stoopid election", or raSam-12/14/2000
376SbH I did make an assumption in my post and I should not do so. ht MagMagnatizer-12/14/2000
375Hi SbH - statistics cannot lie b/c by definition it is inconclusive. Assignment Bosco-12/14/2000
374Magnatizer <I>It only makes sense that they would have the cheaper machinSBHX-12/14/2000
373Hi SbH - at the risk of offending a lot of people here, I actually prefer campy Bosco-12/14/2000
372Scared but Hopeful <i>But I now hear that Jesse Jackson and even some repMagnatizer-12/14/2000
371Bosco, With the advent of the internet, it has been a while (2 years) since I wSBHX-12/14/2000
370Hi Carl - I was talking to a colleague of mine yesterday morning how President-eBosco-12/14/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News