SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Interdigital Communication(IDCC)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5195 110 0 IDCC
Emcee:  nicmar Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3945 SOC isn't cutting it yet. Is multi-chip package a better answer today? By JGus-2/15/2000
3944 Gus, those two press releases sound promising if you lap your information rightBux-2/15/2000
3943 Correct link to Goldman Sachs' Wireless Wave II goldmansachs.com Exhibit 1Gus-2/15/2000
3942 <b> November 15, 1996 A CDMA BELIEVER As a developer of CDMA technologGus-2/15/2000
3941 I agree Quincy, the term "IS-95" would probably not find it's wayBux-2/15/2000
3940 <i>Yes, I did answer the question. </i> No, I don't think you Bux-2/14/2000
3939 <i>By sharp contrast, IDC has asserted point blank that it doesn't neBux-2/14/2000
3938 Darrell, I never said "IS-95=CDMA2000", stop misrepresenting what I hBux-2/14/2000
3937 <i>Yes, I did answer the question. </i> Ok...I may have missed theslacker711-2/14/2000
3936 Bux, terms such as CDMA2000 and IS95 are red-herrings designed to distract us fQuincy-2/14/2000
3935 Yes, I did answer the question. Moreover, the move to realign global frequenciGus-2/14/2000
3934 <i>Will providers ever use channels wider than 10Mhz? The Mobileslacker711-2/14/2000
3933 LOL. Darrell. I have Bux on ignore, but he apparently is still shamelessly coGus-2/14/2000
3932 <i> why not stick to the real issues at hand that affect IDC's futurew molloy-2/14/2000
3931 Thanks, Jim. For future reference. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 18, 1996 IGus-2/14/2000
3930 you need to re-read prior posts Bux. restating former points is useless if youD.J.Smyth-2/14/2000
3929 <i>It hasn't earned them access to other Q patents which could make BGus-2/14/2000
3928 <i>The projections that IDC will collect large royalties from this arrangBux-2/14/2000
3927 Bux, your first statement is off: "the projections that IDC will collect lD.J.Smyth-2/14/2000
3926 Darrell, the projections that IDC will collect large royalties on 3G CDMA appeaBux-2/14/2000
3925 consider IDC/TXN partnership from today's TXN newsrelease: ragingbull.com D.J.Smyth-2/14/2000
3924 I may have missed this a while back, but is there a date for the ERICY/IDC hearGeorge Leeper-2/14/2000
3923 Very good. The HDR statement was accidentally omitted from my first post. I sQuincy-2/14/2000
3922 "I don't have faith the ITU can force a licensing regime on anyone.CleD.J.Smyth-2/14/2000
3921 "will say that IDC's agreement with Qualcomm was pertinent to IS-95 onQuincy-2/14/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News