SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
AOL, now I get it
An SI Board Since August 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
496 2 0 AOL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
396 Tell 'em to push her up to 40 or 45, I want puts! Barryyard_man-1/28/1997
395 AOL +2.125 Hmm, you think you have a stock figured and then the impossible isRyan M-1/28/1997
394 Hi Barry: I saw her move up this morning some..but havet looked at the volume yJames F. Hopkins-1/28/1997
393 You're right shorting is risky and I would have cleaned up. Looks like itsyard_man-1/28/1997
392 HI Barry: My data showes the stock will gapdown in the morning about 1/2 : thiJames F. Hopkins-1/28/1997
391 HI Barry: I needed that "upgrade" <VBG> well I got out into aprJames F. Hopkins-1/27/1997
390 Linda, Covered my short today @ 33 1/2. Didn't really expect the order toyard_man-1/27/1997
389 >The answer is. If AOL does not do right by the public and offer some type oJoel Sternberg-1/27/1997
388 Hey James, Could you get another analyst to upgrade this stock again. Nice reyard_man-1/27/1997
387 Hi Jack: There will always be somebody with an intrest, singing praise for thisJames F. Hopkins-1/26/1997
386 You're probably right there, jack. They'd figure out which areas were hyard_man-1/26/1997
385 Hi Leo: Glad you asked, see I didn't pay much mind to march, likely wont, bJames F. Hopkins-1/26/1997
384 >I don't know how they could reasonably base it on individuals >custojack rand-1/26/1997
383 HI Barry : Refunds, well the normal way and fair way it goes is like this, youJames F. Hopkins-1/26/1997
382 You're right it makes sense to buy the calls now when they are cheaper. EiLeo J. Capobianco, DO-1/26/1997
381 oops, you right:')Leo J. Capobianco, DO-1/26/1997
380 Barry your right , the amout of lowered earnings ratings, don't capture as James F. Hopkins-1/26/1997
379 I don't know but I hope they try, every time Steve opens his mouth, he shooJames F. Hopkins-1/26/1997
378 Barry- In my opinion they don't counter it as matter of fact I don't tBill Chase-1/26/1997
377 IF it happens, I think it will be a one-time refund across the board for all payard_man-1/26/1997
376 By downgrades you mean lowered earnings estimates? Yes, that is why I was thayard_man-1/26/1997
375 Rgeardless of whether at its own initiative or by force of state AG's (and jack rand-1/26/1997
374 What I meant(perhaps I wasn't real clear) was what you said is a long term yard_man-1/26/1997
373 >when that comes out -.50 this stock will dump like it went over >niagra jack rand-1/26/1997
372 I guess that you've already heard about Compuserve's 30 second spot. Blyard_man-1/26/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News