SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Interdigital Communication(IDCC)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5195 110 0 IDCC
Emcee:  nicmar Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4295 Follow your own advice, Carranza. You're the one with the unrealistic expeGus-6/19/2000
4294 "I can see that the vile is brewing. Try to keep it in check, if you can. Terrapin-6/19/2000
4293 I can see that the vile is brewing. Try to keep it in check, if you can. Makecarranza2-6/19/2000
4292 I can see that the vile is brewing. Try to keep it in check, if you can. Makecarranza2-6/19/2000
4291 More questions? LOL. You're not looking for 2G CDMAOne chips from IDCC noGus-6/19/2000
4290 Now, Gussie, you and I know that putting a title on something doesn't make carranza2-6/19/2000
4289 As expected, the UK operators are moving fast to utilize their expensive spectrGus-6/19/2000
4288 If there's 27 other companies that are submitting essential IPR would they Jim Lurgio-6/19/2000
4287 Ah, the soft handoff method also has limitations. So you have the hard handoffGus-6/18/2000
4286 Because if a soft-handoff that does not infringe Q's patents can't be dcarranza2-6/18/2000
4285 Telecomms ¯ Claire Woffenden [17 May 2000] <b>Orange snubs mobilepostyle-6/18/2000
4284 Why is getting around the soft hand off a big issue? Qualcomm has clearly stateJim Lurgio-6/18/2000
4283 After studying the Q's "heart and soul" CDMA patents (Nos.4,901,3carranza2-6/18/2000
4282 Carranza2: Is that not limited to 5MHg and lower? eom.Richard Monahan-6/18/2000
4281 Can anyone here explain to me how IDCC or (anyone, for that matter) will be ablcarranza2-6/17/2000
4280 And I say again, that you're not thinking straight anymore, Carranza. ThiGus-6/16/2000
4279 Again, Carranza. You're not thinking straight anymore and just writing outGus-6/16/2000
4278 Gussie, you criticized me for supposedly relying too much on the Chinese marketcarranza2-6/16/2000
4277 Gussie-boy, your fellow IDCC'ers must love the stink your vile attracts to carranza2-6/16/2000
4276 You're becoming more incoherent, Carranza. What a pity to watch a once-proGus-6/16/2000
4275 Your penchant for wishful thinking is simply overwhelming, Gus-ano. <i>Icarranza2-6/16/2000
4274 I did answer your question. If you're going to play this amateurish game oGus-6/16/2000
4273 These are fighting words from LSI, an acknowledged pioneer in chip integration,Gus-6/15/2000
4272 Thanks for posting this earlier, P. <b> EARLY LEARNING As third generatGus-6/15/2000
4271 carranza2, I read your post on RB about considering IDCC as an investment...erpostyle-6/15/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News