INTC | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
INTC

An SI Board Since March 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
990	16	0	INTC

Emcee: Jules B. Garfunkel	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
465	RayW & Fuchi Wu - Re: "You are such a narrow-minded people all the tim	Paul Engel	-	6/14/1997
464	IA: You seem to be confusing your Juleses and your Alberts. FYI: If you want	Harrison Hickman	-	6/14/1997
463	Jules, You are such a narrow-minded people all the time! Who do you think you	Investor A	-	6/13/1997
462	Hi Jules, on my way to pick up a video tonight I decided to stop by our local C	greenspirit	-	6/13/1997
461	Re: <<"A BILLION CONNECTED COMPUTERS" >> John: I think yo	Harry Landsiedel	-	6/12/1997
460	Option King, we are now back to ground zero. That is what I was trying to get	Sonny McWilliams	-	6/12/1997
459	The point others were trying to make is that most individual investors do not	Bikergirl	-	6/12/1997
458	Jules sorry, but I would rather not. I do respect the members wishes and will n	AK2004	-	6/12/1997
457	Albert, Please respect the request made in the first post of this thread and su	Jules B. Garfunkel	-	6/12/1997
456	John I am still trying to locate intel's news release about price-cuts. Co	AK2004	-	6/12/1997
455	John, Alright, I guess your explanation makes sense. That's why you are a	Sonny McWilliams	-	6/11/1997
454	For John Hull and no one else. Next time you have to burn the midnight oil pre	Richard F Hanover	-	6/11/1997
453	Sonny, the point is to allow enough time for the information to be REASONABLY a	John Hull	-	6/11/1997
452	John Hull, I have written several posts on this subject. I might be wrong, but	Sonny McWilliams	-	6/11/1997
451	Jules, three comments: 1. We decided to preannounce after a meeting the evenin	John Hull	-	6/11/1997
450	Sonny, I don't understand. Are you suggesting that we should make that kind	John Hull	-	6/11/1997
449	Jules, this was an absolutely well written and thought out letter. But after al	Sonny McWilliams	-	6/10/1997
448	Jules, You did a much better job of explaining the meeting than I could have.	Larry Loeb	-	6/10/1997
447	Jules: Bravo!! I always look forward to reading your posts and you do not dis	Ann Williams	-	6/10/1997
446	Jules,I want to share also my gratitude for all the effort, time and preparati	Frank Ellis Morris	-	6/10/1997
445	Jules: I can't begin to tell you how much I appreciate your brilliant port	Nuni	-	6/9/1997
444	Hi Jules, re your review of the NY analysts' meeting. I've been waitin	Peter Mills	-	6/9/1997
443	John Hull and All, The following scenario while hypothetical, is based on deduc	Jules B. Garfunkel	-	6/9/1997
442	Jules and all, This may be of interest <http://www.cnet.com/Content/Review	Riskmgmt	-	6/7/1997
441	I have a buy order of INTCW for $105, saw the price at $100 on tradepb.com, cal	Mike Wong	-	6/6/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):