SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL)
An SI Board Since April 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5102 19 0 INPR
Emcee:  Kashish King Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4877 Rod, You are 100% correct. Since I sold when the merger was announced it'Tom C-5/12/2000
4876 Got my settlement checks today also. Lost THOUSANDS, got back $100 and change.J. Kittle-5/12/2000
4875 HISTORY HAS BEEN MADE!! After a gagillion years on this miserable thread, Rod David R-5/12/2000
4874 That Inprise actually contacted Corel about the merger is, in my opinion, evideKashish King-5/12/2000
4873 Anyone remember Borland at $80? And the class action lawsuit against them datiHarry Sharp-5/11/2000
4872 So, now that INPR=CORL price ... how much will INPR shareholders get if & wBP Ritchie-5/11/2000
4871 WE ARE IN RALLY MODE..time to make money...GOTTA GO BUY BYE I am, Truly your$, Crystal ball-5/11/2000
4870 Well, I sincerely hope that everybody is correct in assuming that the deal is gatvcb-5/11/2000
4869 I can't imagine the sort of brain-dead thinking that went into this deal inKashish King-5/11/2000
4868 Everybody: Say you are convinced that the deal is off. What are the implicatiJerry Whlan-5/10/2000
4867 Rod, INPR @ 5.25 now 85% of CORL @ 5.875 instead of the merger number of 74.7%rkral-5/10/2000
4866 All they had to do is look at the performance of the company versus the empty rKashish King-5/10/2000
4865 Depending on the circumstances, it might not cost much at all. If the shareholDavid R-5/9/2000
4864 If shareholders vote it down, then nothing. 29Million otherwise.Mark Bracey-5/9/2000
4863 How much will it cost us to get out of this mess? Estimates!dana ingram-5/9/2000
4862 It seems that the board is reconsidering this deal. This is good news. HoweveDavid R-5/9/2000
4861 The Cowpland Factor Cowpland touted their fizzled Video Conferencing system asKashish King-5/5/2000
4860 As a practical matter, it makes no sense whatsoever for any industry outsiders Kashish King-5/5/2000
4859 I agree, and in addition to the quantitative analysis, or the lack of it, by thatvcb-5/2/2000
4858 The updated Broadview report should not only take into account changes in the fDennis Nicks-5/2/2000
4857 David, there was a caller from Merrill Lynch on the Inprise CC. I just listeneDennis Nicks-5/2/2000
4856 An audio link that suggests what I have been saying: biz.yahoo.comKashish King-5/1/2000
4855 Admittedly, my exposure to JBuilder has been minimal -- limited only to tinkerii-node-5/1/2000
4854 Well, you haven't used JBuilder 2.0 which even a diehard Borland enthusiastKashish King-5/1/2000
4853 <i>The problem isn't the world-class language tool design, it's ti-node-5/1/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News