SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
My House
An SI Board Since September 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7689 21 0
Emcee:  Original Mad Dog Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6639I have 8 inches of snow it was SO prettyRainy_Day_Woman-4/9/2003
6638no I wouldn't s m i l eRainy_Day_Woman-4/9/2003
6637<i> History didn't start with tobacco warning labels, friend. There waTimF-4/9/2003
6636<i> Cigarettes have had warning labels for decades. </i> History didLazarus_Long-4/8/2003
6635You have it right.Ish-4/8/2003
6634The tobacco thing is pure bull. Don't subsidize what you're going to taxIsh-4/8/2003
6633<i> There is no "they" here. There is an "us". No oneTimF-4/8/2003
6632I hope your right. I also hope that sooner or later is "sooner" enougTimF-4/8/2003
6631No. It's all but impossible to get rid of any laws. You may recall we receLane3-4/8/2003
6630In addition to being against a lot of legal restrictions against smoking I am alTimF-4/8/2003
6629I was going to mention the absurdity of the governments farm programs and their Oral Roberts-4/8/2003
6628<< but rather the fact that they take away the right of the property ownerIsh-4/8/2003
6627Do you really think either the no smoking in restaurants laws or affirmative actTimF-4/8/2003
6626<i> but they used to push cigarettes as GOOD FOR YOU. </i> That wTimF-4/8/2003
6625I was just reading about the battle over affirmative action and Va. Tech. They Lane3-4/8/2003
6624OKAAAAY. Amendment XIV (1868) Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in thLazarus_Long-4/8/2003
6623Laz, if you want to vent about affirmative action as it is now construed, go aheLane3-4/7/2003
6622So: Do you honestly believe that they honestly believed that even a majority ofLazarus_Long-4/7/2003
6621I don't know why you would say it was planned, which it would have to be if Lane3-4/7/2003
6620<i>"They" were the people who stood to benefit by enforcing quotSolon-4/7/2003
6619Oh, but there was a "they" there. "They" were the people wLazarus_Long-4/7/2003
6618There is no "they" here. There is an "us". No one person dSolon-4/7/2003
6617You really should move to civilization. :-)Lazarus_Long-4/7/2003
6616Hmmm.... What was done was essentially a fraud. They initially got massive supLazarus_Long-4/7/2003
6615Laz, the terminology and methodology and sensitivity changed a number of times oLane3-4/7/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News