SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
QDEL - Quidel more quick diagnosis
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1693 11 0 QDEL
Emcee:  Peter Caradonna Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
668 Just last 21 June 1996 Quidel announced the addition of Henry Schein to its lisMike Relyea-4/22/1997
667 Well said jeeza. Typical 'Howard the Shark' behaviour. Your stock will Mr Logic-4/22/1997
666 howard....sore loser ??? looks to me that u want to scare the shit out of smaljeeza-4/22/1997
665 I disagree, using your rubber band analogy, I think the rubber band has been pusteve dietrich-4/22/1997
664 I think the rubber band broke at $3.00 a share. This stock is going to take a Howard Schellenberg-4/22/1997
663 Mark, Here are my comments to your "facts and a few theories:" MarkMike Relyea-4/22/1997
662 This response is not directed at you Robert just wanted to join in the discussiMark Padre-4/22/1997
661 Brooke, I'm not sure why Safeplan is not talked about. It is my understanRobert Busse-4/21/1997
660 Go over to the other thread & read the "starter" post. It is mentAmbrym Man-4/21/1997
659 To Anyone: Does anyone have more info on SAFE PLAN?? Why is it not talked aboBrooke-4/21/1997
658 It looks like you were correct about StockSmart being incorrect. They have justAmbrym Man-4/21/1997
657 It would appear to me that if as you say, the lawsuit is a matter of money, thesteve dietrich-4/21/1997
656 Quidel stated to they were thinking about licensing fees of 6%! How many years jad-4/21/1997
655 Howard, To whom did you speak at Quidel?? Re: your comment "does not looRobert Busse-4/21/1997
654 Talked to Quidel on Friday. Seems the lawsuit is a matter of money and not driHoward Schellenberg-4/21/1997
653 Cleary,Gull report of 4-3-97 rates Qdel as a "#1-Buy" with a 12 monthRobert Busse-4/19/1997
652 Joe, Couldn't find your e-mail address-if you can, please e-mail me at RJBRobert Busse-4/19/1997
651 I haven't seen the Oberweis Report so I don't know if they are coveringjad-4/19/1997
650 re: the patent dispute. I'm a layman and I haven't seen the BD complaiRobert Busse-4/19/1997
649 Jeff, Because of losses in past years, Qdel will not have any taxes to pay forRobert Busse-4/19/1997
648 I believe earnings are untaxed. If so, and you adjust for taxes, you get aboutjeffbas-4/19/1997
647 George, I think your estimates are entirely reasonable. I also hope that, if Robert Busse-4/18/1997
646 Quarter and year end estimates: Bob and other Quidel avid followers, I have pGeorge Young-4/18/1997
645 I understand why you think StockSmart screwed up. Because earlier in the monthAmbrym Man-4/18/1997
644 Howard, Glad to see you back here - it has been a rought week or so for all ofRobert Busse-4/18/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News