SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Pluvia vs. Westergaard
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1267 13 0
Emcee:  JEFF CHAPMAN Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
742 Louis, where do you draw the line between fact and opinion? For example, which Jeffrey S. Mitchell-8/31/1997
741 Links to Steve's potentially (I am not an attorney) libelous statements agaLouis Riley-8/31/1997
740 Tom, great post. I personally will bet dollars to doughnuts that this never seeWendell Holmes-8/31/1997
739 Scott, as I read it, Westergaard has no standing whatsoever to sue Pluvia. It&#Thomas G. Busillo-8/31/1997
738 Hey Steve, are you gonna answer my questions about selling ILT equipment or conWendell Holmes-8/31/1997
737 <i> << Brandishing a gun in public and engaging in extortion are clLouis Riley-8/31/1997
736 There are big differences between civil wrongs and criminal acts. The courts haWendell Holmes-8/31/1997
735 How do you get on TheSteeret.com? I can't do it with their help! Bummer! Scrapps-8/31/1997
734 All Pluvia v. Westergaard: I'm new to this internet thing. Is this threadBuzzVA-8/31/1997
733 Scott- I enjoyed your insights. In my humble opinion, we must take this debateTech Master-8/31/1997
732 John's implied threats of litigation are simply a bunch of grandstanding. Bill Wexler-8/31/1997
731 Oh please. This isn't even really an ethics issue. I liken it to a debateBill Wexler-8/31/1997
730 You wrote that you regard Westergaard's actions as analagous to showing a wSuperhawk-8/31/1997
729 Wow. Talk about extrapolating. How did you conclude that I sanction extortionBill Wexler-8/31/1997
728 I really don't think this will have a chilling effect on internet discussioBill Wexler-8/31/1997
727 Yes, Joe, Bill has just said that it's OK to yell the proverbial "fireJeffrey S. Mitchell-8/30/1997
726 C, sorry, I can only <I> and <B>, but there are people on USRX threJoseph G.-8/30/1997
725 Joe, Thank you! Have you noticed how much shouting has been on the thread tonCisco-8/30/1997
724 Why don't you visit Westergaard's site and see for yourself how he explJoseph G.-8/30/1997
723 Thank you, that is what I asked for. Regards TomTom C-8/30/1997
722 OK, now we're getting somewhere. You've just argued that everyone has tJeffrey S. Mitchell-8/30/1997
721 Tom, From the AOL Motley Fool PLSIA board: << Subject: Re: Overview of Louis Riley-8/30/1997
720 <b>Steve, you are so predictable: ignore any unethical transgressions, trLouis Riley-8/30/1997
719 <<after he knowingly falsely posted that the company had shipped NO laserTom C-8/30/1997
718 <<OK, but does Westergaard have the right to get a louder microphone>&Bill Wexler-8/30/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News