SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
REVERSE SPLITS ! Mad as Hell not Going to Take It
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
217 8 0
Emcee:  SnakeCharmer Type:  Unmoderated
REVERSE SPLITS SUCK! PHOOEY... I'm Mad as Hell......and I'm not Going to Take it Anymore!!!!!!!!

If you trade the pennies enough, the dreaded "RS" will surely eventually rob you. Rarely are reverse splits successful, and many publicly owned companies are using them as a way to create no-fault/no-pay financing at the expense of unsuspecting investors. Sometimes there are clear signs that a split is possible or likely. Sometimes signs can be more difficult to read.
I was recently involved in a Reverse that took me and many others by surprise while taking us to the bank with a 70:1 RS. The immediate result of this split slashed the stock price by nearly 50% before the new symbol had even traded. The real surprise with this stock, was the news releases about acquisitions, financing and the company' hard line approach to dealing with "shorters" and illegal offshore debentures that simply didn't legally exist. In one well written news release about an exciting name change and possible merger, the CEO explained that the name change was necessary to force the illegal shorters to cover. In the same release, the company announced it's first ever dividend to shareholders in the form of stock warrants in the new symbol as a token of loyalty and good faith. (The hook!) The release also included a request from the CEO for stockholders to call for and hold the stock in certificate form to force the shorts to cover. This was the first sign that should have told us that we were just lambs being lead to the slaughter. The fact that the price could not be moved upward regardless of how many shares were bought should have been another sign. Of course we were all convinced of the illegal short position and everyone bought shares as fast as the company could unload them. The jury is still out as to whether this stock will rebound or continue to crash and burn. The percentages greatly favor the latter.
So let's discuss in this forum, ways to spot the signs of the reverse split so that maybe we can all learn to identify some of the warnings. Tell us about a split you have been involved in or just vent some anger about being robbed by this legal form of theft. This thread is open to all. Please share anything you may have.

S~
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
217 Here's one that takes the cake: AOSH (American Ostrich). 1/32,000 RS comiTazman-4/7/1999
216 Dennis, Re FAMH... another "Cheryl OD" and "Brad" job... TBob Davis-2/6/1999
215 Bob... I started this thread out of disgust over the apparent misrepresentatioSnakeCharmer-2/5/1999
214 Bob Try the FAMH thread. Misleading and false pr's,stockholders meeting to dennis foster-2/5/1999
213 Bob, the "classic" stockholder revolt that I have experienced has comcampe-2/4/1999
212 Guys, I am interested in learning more about how individual investors have reaBob Davis-2/4/1999
211 Bob Davis Re: FIBR, on your letter napeague.com First, my disclosure, I am lJoseph Hoane-2/2/1999
210 GJC, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I unfortunately do not folloBob Davis-1/28/1999
209 Bob, nice site... Can you please give me an opinion on a recent reverse split/campe-1/6/1999
208 Harold, Thank you for your "review" of my analysis. I think that yoBob Davis-1/6/1999
207 Hello Bob: Thanks for you time and effort and great job on tracking some of thHarold Feller-1/6/1999
206 I've just completed an in-depth analysis of recent reverse splits, which shBob Davis-1/5/1999
205 I use Ameritrade and Fidelity. This is just a 'toy' stock for me - i onFredman-1/5/1999
204 Hello Fred: In most cases (of course there are exceptions) a reverse split is aHarold Feller-1/5/1999
203 i only have very very small pocket change in it, no biggee. Fredman-1/3/1999
202 Fred--I don't know the oils...1 for 5 reverse ain't too bad, oils beat TraderGreg-1/3/1999
201 TG, NORT (an Oil on the Nasdaq) is trading for around .41/share, they are goinFredman-1/3/1999
200 OK, I understand now; their desire is to retire the shares and no longer trade Dr. Harvey-11/1/1998
199 If you have 100 shares of a 25 cent stock and the company did a 200 for 1 reverTraderGreg-10/31/1998
198 The part I am not understanding is the " payout " Dr. Harvey-10/31/1998
197 Here's a simplified example Scum #1 owns 37,000 shares Scum #2 owns 37,00TraderGreg-10/31/1998
196 Because the sub human garbage trying to do the reverse needed the money to recoTraderGreg-10/31/1998
195 Truly the mother of all reverse stock splits; but the one thing I can't figDr. Harvey-10/31/1998
194 A 37000 for 1 reverse??!!!. Why not just use a gun and rob the other shareholdTraderGreg-10/31/1998
193 Here is an interesting reverse split attempt: May be a record. biz.yahoo.comHarold Feller-10/31/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):