SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1596456 521 0
Emcee:  Duncan Baird Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
123357Sure, vvga. I'm used to Rambusian arithmetic, along will all the other dubiDaniel Schuh-8/31/2000
123356> I think INTEL owns Rambus and will do everything possible to screw up ddr. jcholewa-8/31/2000
123355<i>1000MB/s is referring to what exactly?</i> To the scores posted porn_start878-8/31/2000
123354<< There isn't going to be quantity of DRDRAM around next year, so ththat_crazy_doug-8/31/2000
123353Thanks to Max, Steve Harris, and thewatsonyouth for the benchmarks. tgptndrTGPTNDR-8/31/2000
123352>multiple channel DDR-sdram would have done the job as well >with lower lavvga-8/31/2000
123351Barry, re:<SiSoft Sandra memory benchmarks show the P4 delivering an ALU memoPetz-8/31/2000
123350Frank, ted, <IMO, when the 1 gig threshold was reached, many consumers and inPetz-8/31/2000
123349What I hope is that they figure out that they can't patent JEDEC standards. porn_start878-8/31/2000
123348<i>The big question mark here is wheter Intel choose RMBS because of ittejek-8/31/2000
123347I think INTEL owns Rambus and will do everything possible to screw up ddr. JKJeff Kirk-8/31/2000
123346The big question mark here is wheter Intel choose RMBS because of it's superporn_start878-8/31/2000
123345Re: <i>I'm a tad puzzled by the Rambus ppl who come in here and say thchic_hearne-8/31/2000
123344I'm a tad puzzled by the Rambus ppl who come in here and say they "doubstribe30-8/31/2000
123343This from JC's : it's dated 21th of July... so too old CROSS PLATFORM porn_start878-8/31/2000
123342<i>DRDRAM has latency problems, which cause many benchmarks to achieve lowtejek-8/31/2000
123341Re: <i>I suspect that production Willy will beat a 600MHz Celeron. Maybe echic_hearne-8/31/2000
123340Ted, <i>Most appraisals of RDRM that I have seen indicate that it does enScumbria-8/31/2000
123339Chic, <i>I'm convinced that stuff is bogus. It's too good to be tScumbria-8/31/2000
123338Re: <i>I'm here to talk about Rambus, and not about the current legal Dan3-8/31/2000
123337<i>Did I just miss your sarcasm in your first post?</i> chic, No. tejek-8/31/2000
123336ted, Did I just miss your sarcasm in your first post? chicchic_hearne-8/31/2000
123335<i>What have you been smoking tonight? On the other 2 benchmarks, the Celtejek-8/31/2000
123334Re: <i>If the RMBS/P4 benchmarks are as good as 2CPU and the Register claichic_hearne-8/31/2000
123333chic... I missed your post of not shorting the Bu$$. And after all we went throurichard surckla-8/30/2000
123332You can see the entire articles here: <i>http://www.2cpu.com/Hardware/wiltejek-8/30/2000
123331<i>Ted, when Scumbia starts talking about Bill, it is the revisionist histtejek-8/30/2000
123330Barry, Re: RDRAM The weakest point in your argument is that even if all the tefp_scientist-8/30/2000
123329Re: <i>Your shorted Rambus at 81$. Did you cover or are you going for morechic_hearne-8/30/2000
123328chic... You little devil you. You told me you were shorting Rambus but you didnrichard surckla-8/30/2000
123327Barry, I have a few problems with your position. 1). I don't buy those bechic_hearne-8/30/2000
123326<i>OT I'm looking for recent benchmarks of the various PC types(MAC, PTHE WATSONYOUTH-8/30/2000
123325First let me say that I'm a Rambus and Intel long, and I've never been aBarry A. Watzman-8/30/2000
123324Tejek Re..<<<b>Sometimes its the History Channel, sometimes the Dihmaly-8/30/2000
123323Ted, Thanks, SI is getting more confusing everyday. JohnRoad Walker-8/30/2000
123322<i>I was surprised to see any post here, I thought all your folks were on tejek-8/30/2000
123321OT I'm looking for recent benchmarks of the various PC types(MAC, PIII, AthlTGPTNDR-8/30/2000
123320<i>I can see by the article that the companies think being the leader in stejek-8/30/2000
123319Now Scumbria, you don't want to burst any bubbles about how the Republicans combjelly-8/30/2000
123318Hector Ruiz to Serve as Acting Head of AMD Computation Products Group SUNNYVALEAlighieri-8/30/2000
123317Ted, I was surprised to see any post here, I thought all your folks were on theRoad Walker-8/30/2000
123316<i>Do you think the interest will return soon after Intel announces the P4f.simons-8/30/2000
123315<i>IMO, when the 1 gig threshold was reached, many consumers and investorsAlighieri-8/30/2000
123314<i>However, I am sure you also can see by that article how being the leadef.simons-8/30/2000
123313<i>In fact that extremly small chance is probably increased (by an fairly Alighieri-8/30/2000
123312The Archduke died. See raven.cc.ukans.edu for the best concise treatment a quicDaniel Schuh-8/30/2000
123311<i>It happened in Sarajevo, Ted.</i> Dan, I knew that!! I just wtejek-8/30/2000
123310It happened in Sarajevo, Ted. Cheers, Dan.Daniel Schuh-8/30/2000
123309<i>Didn't WWI start in Yugoslavia?</I> Scumbria, It was startetejek-8/30/2000
123308<i>In the case of Intel, the race has now proven to be expensive and embartejek-8/30/2000
123307OT <i> Didn't WWI start in Yugoslavia? </i> That might have TimF-8/30/2000
123306Tim, Didn't WWI start in Yugoslavia? ScumbriaScumbria-8/30/2000
123305OT <i> Neville Chamberlain didn't intervene when there was vital BritTimF-8/30/2000
123304>>And Frank Simon, you think that MHz/GHz doesn't count, you might wanf.simons-8/30/2000
123303Tim, <i>Neville Chamberlain didn't intervene when there was vital BriScumbria-8/30/2000
123302Scumbria. Neville Chamberlain didn't intervene when there <b>was<TimF-8/30/2000
123301That was my implication. If DRAM mfrg's decide to reduce or further limit Rchris431-8/30/2000
123300<i> The Nixon "wage and price controls" were a really brilliant TimF-8/30/2000
123299<i>This could very well be the beginning of the offensive the mfgr's htejek-8/30/2000
123298For those of you who own the AMD K6-2+ (or who just like to read technical stufstribe30-8/30/2000
123297This could very well be the beginning of the offensive the mfgr's have been chris431-8/30/2000
123296<i>Hyundai Joins Micron In Suing Rambus electronicnews.com </i> Scotejek-8/30/2000
123295<b>Excellent article..explains why AMD's stock is lagging and why Intetejek-8/30/2000
123294<i>Ted AMD's 3rd quarter earnings come out on October 11th. AMD got batejek-8/30/2000
123293Intel, IBM, Others to Open Lab for Linux Software Development Portland, Oregontejek-8/30/2000
123292Intel in Driver's Seat Despite Latest Bump A rather.. shall we say, Pro-Intstribe30-8/30/2000
123291AMD Offers New High Density Flash Memory Solution for Portable Applications; Devtejek-8/30/2000
123290OTOT Dan3, to make a hopefully non-partisan contribution to the current OT ramblDaniel Schuh-8/30/2000
123289Hyundai Joins Micron In Suing Rambus electronicnews.comstribe30-8/30/2000
123288<font color=black> Ted AMD's 3rd quarter earnings come out on October eplace-8/30/2000
123287Tim <i>I think most of the credit that goes to any government or quasi-gotejek-8/29/2000
123286Re: <i>Aren't you about 24 years old? How do you know so much about ViDan3-8/29/2000
123285Dan3, Aren't you about 24 years old? How do you know so much about Viet Nam,Jim McMannis-8/29/2000
123284<i>I'm not sure. I have noticed they do have some commercials with thetejek-8/29/2000
123283Re: <i>You don't really think these guys had much to do with it do youDan3-8/29/2000
123282Re: <i>Three weeks into the Junior George presidency, people will be affecDan3-8/29/2000
123281Shucks, thought I'd stop by the Intel forums and see what was going on.....steve harris-8/29/2000
123280Ted, OTS <the great inflation hoax> Mr. Luskins main points are well foundTGPTNDR-8/29/2000
123279OT Scumbria-- That's kind of a silly response. Since you're in the spiriEric K.-8/29/2000
123278Scumbria - RE: "I'd appreciate it if you could keep this on-topic stuffCirruslvr-8/29/2000
123277Cirrus, I'd appreciate it if you could keep this on-topic stuff off the thrScumbria-8/29/2000
123276snark!Björn-8/29/2000
123275Tim, <i>Powell (and perhaps to a lesser extent Bush) was somewhat timid wScumbria-8/29/2000
123274Tim, <i>I don't think Nixon was incompetent or even close to it.</Scumbria-8/29/2000
123273OT <i> The great heroes Bush and Powell decided that intervention in SaraTimF-8/29/2000
123272OT <i> Under Clinton, a delicate balance was reached in the economy permiTimF-8/29/2000
123271Ted - RE: "Have you heard the GTW commercial where they very quickly mentioCirruslvr-8/29/2000
123270Dear Scumbria: You forgot to include the previous sentences in the web site youpgerassi-8/29/2000
123269<i> Clinton has done such a good job managing the critical business of theTimF-8/29/2000
123268Ted, <i>Actually, there are some who believe that its because Sanders heaScumbria-8/29/2000
123267Scumbria <i>Scumbria is actually mackeral.</I> Sardine...mackeral,tejek-8/29/2000
123266Ted, <i>You are smarter than I thought..</i> Scumbria is actually Scumbria-8/29/2000
123265Pete, I have no doubt that having Republicans in control of the Congress has heScumbria-8/29/2000
123264<i>If Luskin was my brother, I would also be Luskin. ;^))</I> Scumbtejek-8/29/2000
123263Ted, <i>Is Luskin your brother?</i> If Luskin was my brother, I woScumbria-8/29/2000
123262<B>Scumbria, This article is just for you!! Is Luskin your brother?</btejek-8/29/2000
123261OT <i> The list is tremendous, but I will point out the cornerstone. TheTimF-8/29/2000
123260Dear Scumbria: The Debt the Democrats in the House and Senate at the time piledpgerassi-8/29/2000
123259<b>Interesting analysis of MU vs RMBS</b> __________________________tejek-8/29/2000
123258OT <i> banned submachine guns.. </i> Actually the "Assault TimF-8/29/2000
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News