SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
15033Jefferson never had the potential. Nixon, now, is a different matter. You haLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15032Actually both of them were LL wannabeesone_less-6/19/2002
15031The current theory is that the letter thing may not have been true either. The ione_less-6/19/2002
15030yep.one_less-6/19/2002
15029<i>Far enough away that I don't have to worry about evacuation. </Lazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15028Pretty hot letter! :-)Lazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15027You can PM your confession to me. Then it's good for blackmail. :-)Lazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15026That was nineteen pages, I didn't realize. Sheesh. Going out to dinner now.E-6/19/2002
15025cs.virginia.edu What, you didn't believe I wrote them all? :-)Lazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15024<i> It's in the horse- has- been- stolen- already- so- what's- theLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15023I didn't mean the FS on that front, I meant the libertarians at Reason. TheWin Smith-6/19/2002
15022That is a WONDERFUL list of quotes. Post the darn URL. I only read about a quarE-6/19/2002
15021You need some inspiration. Memorize these by tomorrow morning. There will be aLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15020I'm good at this. One of my few skills. :-) (Sure no good with the WAG.)Lazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15019<i>If they didn't mean it, why didn't they publicly call the jerk E-6/19/2002
15018Close enough to breath the smoke and see occasional wind blown ashes falling. Faone_less-6/19/2002
15017The funny thing is that the consequences of suppressing natural fires has been kLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15016<i>"Can't quite tell if they're for or agin' it."<one_less-6/19/2002
15015That could have been a rerun from 13-14 years ago, that particular debate was muWin Smith-6/19/2002
15014On the human interest side: A forest service technition has admitted to startingone_less-6/19/2002
15013I saw a public television special last night that pointed out how our attempts tone_less-6/19/2002
15012I didn't accomplish anything. You accomplished it all by yourself. <g>Original Mad Dog-6/19/2002
15011How's this: (1) They meant it, or (2) They are idiots. If they didn't Lazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15010*whisper* TRAITOR! :-)Lazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15009And you think you accomplished this how? Huh?Lazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15008*whisper* good job heheE-6/19/2002
15007What's in it for me? (would seem to be the question.) Actually, I'll nE-6/19/2002
15006Just trying to confirm that you believe yourself to be, morally and ethically, mOriginal Mad Dog-6/19/2002
15005<i>"When the President does it, that means that it is not illegal.&quLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15004Well, <i>actually</i>, I didn't start that one. It was a commonLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15003<i>"I, E, believe that every Democrapper Prexy since Tom Jefferson haOriginal Mad Dog-6/19/2002
15002Has Kreskin disappeared? I could google it, I guess. I'm tired of people disE-6/19/2002
15001"I, E, believe that every Democrapper Prexy since Tom Jefferson has been anLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
15000LOL. I'm absolutely sure she felt zealously correct in everything she did,E-6/19/2002
14999I know. No one ever starts them. And passing them along is of course a sort of cE-6/19/2002
14998<i>N showed me, there was a potential professional payoff for her in gettiConstant Reader-6/19/2002
14997No, they really didn't know. It's not like signing a check, that would hE-6/19/2002
14996As Alice Cooper might say, "Welcome to My Nightmare".......Neocon-6/19/2002
14995<i>"Call me Kreskin. And Kreskin would be?"</i> A famousone_less-6/19/2002
14994<i>Allegiance is based on group identity and interaction</i> Why notLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
14993Laugh at me????? All <b>I'm</b> doing is repeating rumors! I dLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
14992And very poor taste. :-)Lazarus_Long-6/19/2002
14991Then I guess Linda didn't have very good manners....Original Mad Dog-6/19/2002
14990Not so, Counselor. Did Woodward say he would announce DT's identity IMMEDLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
14989OTOH, we can take the simple default position that the signed it and understood Lazarus_Long-6/19/2002
14988Linda Lovelace is dead. Since Woodward hasn't announced her as DT, we now kOriginal Mad Dog-6/19/2002
14987<i>You were talking about Linda Lovelace? I'm thinking that there isLazarus_Long-6/19/2002
14986<i>Don't you EVER check back through the string of posts preceding theE-6/18/2002
14985<i>Now why would he sign this? We MUST prove we are right thinking person E-6/18/2002
14984Don't you EVER check back through the string of posts preceding the one yourLazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14983<i>Charges were made, but never proven, that the person behind all this woE-6/18/2002
14982Here she am. What outrage are you perpetrating now, Attila?E-6/18/2002
14981<i>The other thing I remember is that his wife got the unpaid job of runniLazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14980Pardon me, you have Nixon confused with Clinton. (WHERE'S E?)Lazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14979<i>I suppose that's good in this case. It can also make one a moralistLane3-6/18/2002
14978I heard that the real Deep Throat was Linda Lovelace, who heard all the details Dayuhan-6/18/2002
14977<i>Since the Act does require some periodic reports, consultation with CoLazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14976Buchanan was in his early thirties during the Watergate era. He was born in 193Lazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14975<i>Where do they get the alter-ego's thoughts and reactions, for exLazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14974huh? you haven't noticed. <i>"Where do they get the alter-ego&#one_less-6/18/2002
14973Yeah, he should be allowed back on just for entertainment value. :-)Lazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14972This clown was actually found? And he's near you? And you let him live? SLazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14971I think that the red flag in the War Powers Act is: <i>SEC. 8. (d) Nothijttmab-6/18/2002
14970A little? Neo remains the master of understatement!!!!!!!!!jlallen-6/18/2002
14969DNC? No. It was a lawyer in Nashua, NH.jlallen-6/18/2002
14968It was fun while it lasted....jlallen-6/18/2002
14967I think that I assumed someone older in part because Woodward said so and in parLane3-6/18/2002
14966LOL!! D**N! Politics really is rough! A pro wrestler can't take it!Lazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14965The way this is going, Karen, everyone in Washington will soon have been nominatLazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14964Jesse lacks the stamina for politics. cnn.comTigerPaw-6/18/2002
14963That sounds plausible, too.Lane3-6/18/2002
14962Speculation that Deep Throat was an FBI man. theatlantic.comTigerPaw-6/18/2002
14961<i>And then we have the theory that there was no Deep Throat</i> I Lane3-6/18/2002
14960Message 17618625 ?Lazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14959Len Garment had a book a couple years ago that pegged Deep Throat as John Sears.Win Smith-6/18/2002
14958And then we have the theory that there was no Deep Throat- -that that was a fictLazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14957Absolutely.Lazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14956<i>I love Robert Wright. His book The Moral Animal is life-changing, almosLane3-6/18/2002
14955My Congresscritters voted for the resolution. I would think Lee is the only oneLazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14954Sorry. I just couldn't pass up that smart a-- 'yes' answer. Therejttmab-6/18/2002
14953<i>Why not? There was one vote in the House (by Rep. Barbara Lee) against jttmab-6/18/2002
14952<i>Do you know where that is in the US Code?</i> Yes. jttmabjttmab-6/18/2002
14951This guy makes a good case that its Buchanan, even after his denial on Hardball Tom Clarke-6/18/2002
14950<i>"Legally? You have a law that requires them to sell to Canadians eSolon-6/18/2002
14949<i> Their first allegiance (legally and morally) is to the Canadian FamilyLazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14948<i>No one wants to challenge it in the Courts.</i> Why not? There Lazarus_Long-6/18/2002
14947AND <i>ANOTHER</i> LIBERAL DECLARES SHE IS NOT! Congratulations. TLazarus_Long-6/17/2002
14946All right. So who do we have to shoot to get Woodward to tell us who Deep ThroaLazarus_Long-6/17/2002
14945I wouldn't be surprised if Buchanan was Deep Throat. He still holds Old WorlTom Clarke-6/17/2002
14944I have not followed this most recent "outing" effort that closely, butConstant Reader-6/17/2002
14943<i>he would seem to have the temperament for it</i> Yes, I think itTigerPaw-6/17/2002
14942<i>Buchanan makes sense as Deep Throat. </i> I was startled when I Lane3-6/17/2002
14941Buchanan makes sense as Deep Throat. He's also the type of person who mightTigerPaw-6/17/2002
14940I saw most of that episode of Dateline. I never watch that show but I surfed thLane3-6/17/2002
14939Was Buchanan "Deep Throat"? msnbc.com On the trail of ‘Deep ThroaLazarus_Long-6/17/2002
14938Thought so. I saw Joe Biden on TV this morning saying pretty much the same thinLane3-6/16/2002
14937That's an opinion that pretty much mirrors mine.Dayuhan-6/16/2002
14936LOL.Lane3-6/16/2002
14935<i>"...all New Yorkers and Washingtonians are de facto volunteers rigone_less-6/16/2002
14934Why a First Strike Will Surely Backfire By William A. Galston Sunday, June 16Lane3-6/16/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):