| Reply | Message Preview | From | Recs | Posted |
| 17333 | <i>They found NOTHING improper and closed the case.</i> Where does | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17332 | He don't need no viagra for you, Babe. | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17331 | LOL! Hey, wait a minute..... I'm a young, virile stud with no need of via | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17330 | No, that's your Viagra, hon. Get your med names straight, please. <s> | Poet | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17329 | LOL!! I always have it handy just in case I find myself in agreement with Poet. | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17328 | Hope you have your nitro handy, just in case it happens again! <G> | Constant Reader | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17327 | Also, I suspect the Ramsey file might be couched with a few phases like, "A | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17326 | Hey! Stop agreeing with me! You're scaring the hell out of me now!!!!!< | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17325 | Of course they will. That is really what this is all about. There is no real sto | Constant Reader | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17324 | Unless you are trying to see it otherwise, yep.... JLA | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17323 | That is pretty clear, I think. | Constant Reader | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17322 | This seems to be as direct as they can get: <I>"The staff does not b | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17321 | Won't make a difference.....demolibs will still say its no good because ALL | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17320 | I doubt the SEC ever sends anyone a letter stating "You are innocent." | Constant Reader | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17319 | I am surprised it took them so long to finally notice that. As I remember, I pos | Constant Reader | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17318 | cnn.com | MulhollandDrive | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17317 | If you read the SEC documents, it is clear they found NO evidence against Bush. | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17316 | Fine, take those out, say what was taken out but not what it said (that is, say | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17315 | Have Jon Benet Ramsey's parents been exonerated? | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17314 | I don't think that the jury would be allowed to consider that as evidence in | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17313 | Do you mean to tell me you believe that every time the police investigate a matt | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17312 | >>The SEC recommendation not to indict (or exonerate) was dated August 21, | Bill Grant | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17311 | It is as much like that as it is like saying the Boulder police have exonerated | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17310 | But the SEC did pursue it. They expended a great amount of resource over two yea | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17309 | Not only that but the SEC conducted a thorough review of stock performance after | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17308 | Yep. That memo you mentioned on the market activity in the stock really puts the | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17307 | I can think of several good reasons, most notably that the SEC subpoena power is | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17306 | But isn't that a bit like saying the San Francisco Police have not exonerate | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17305 | I don't agree with you. If someone had taken Bush to court, the SEC decisio | Bill Grant | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17304 | <i>"the staff does not believe that an enforcement action is appropri | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17303 | Then why not release the entire SEC file on the matter, then? | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17302 | OK, I understand your point now. Thanks. | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17301 | That's exactly the point. The SEC has the power to prosecute or to not purs | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17300 | It cannot be any clearer. | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17299 | "Based upon the facts" not an effective stonewall a la Clinton..... | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17298 | Cleared. Emphatically. To the full extent of the SEC Enforcement Division's | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17297 | He was cleared. The SEC Enforcement Division was asked to look into the transa | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17296 | <i>He wasn't cleared. The SEC chose not to pursue it because they didn | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17295 | The facts developed by the SEC clear Bush. The SEC's own internal memos e | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17294 | <i>I don't buy that the Harken situation is parallel to anything Clint | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17293 | He wasn't cleared. The SEC chose not to pursue it because they didn't h | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17292 | <i>Why do you and that comedy writer insist Bush did something wrong when | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17291 | <i>One big difference is that Clinton's happened while he was in offic | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17290 | I am a little surprised that more hasn't been made of Bush's DUI alongsi | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17289 | <I>"This inquiry is confidential and should not be construed as an in | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17288 | There is NO parallel, at least not an honest one, to be drawn.... JLA | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17287 | Yes. I saw that. It is part of the market data I was referring to. | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17286 | Here's an SEC memo which states that Harken's stock price didn't ch | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17285 | One big difference is that Clinton's happened while he was in office, and, u | Bill Grant | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17284 | LOL! Karen....puhleeze.... Insider trading is a serious matter. Likewise, pot | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17283 | <i>The SEC investigated Bush and the facts developed clear him....</i&g | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17282 | Add this to the records I want to see..... Also, I want to see any records of Ge | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17281 | What misconduct? The SEC investigated Bush and the facts developed clear him... | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17280 | <i>Had he been honest about his misconduct, I agree the "crimes" | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17279 | Unfortunately, I didn't see any TV last night. I was hoping to leave the hea | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17278 | <i>%^{} </i> I think you've made your point. ;) | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17277 | <i>That's what my posts have been about, of course. </i> Of cou | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17276 | I understand where you're coming from, too. I just can't get exercised | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17275 | No reply either. How odd.... | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17274 | Yeah. Sheesh. I'd certainly trade my financial statement for his anytime.... | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17273 | Hi OMD, I agree that Germany's more pacifist and tolerant, not sure about J | Poet | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17272 | <I>It was also sobering to be reminded of what I already knew: that Bush&# | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17271 | That's an interesting article. I wonder if similar debates were taking plac | Original Mad Dog | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17270 | That'll teach us to choose our parents a little more wisely. | Poet | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17269 | Unfortunately, that is too true. Hope everything goes well. | Constant Reader | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17268 | Later.... The second hospital is all the way in Hackensack, NJ. Yesterday they | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17267 | <i>I do suspect that a few people in the Democratic establishment are a bi | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17266 | I don't think it is an unreasonable question. Why do you think so? If Krugma | Constant Reader | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17265 | I didn't accuse Krugman of making it up and you know it. You started this of | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17264 | Oh, BTW, this would have happened with or without the earlier impeachment effort | Constant Reader | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17263 | Has anyone besides Bill accused Krugman of making up that communication, and by | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17262 | I'm so sorry. Visiting hospitals is draining. See you later. | Poet | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17261 | Your right, of course, that there is no parallel. Surely the leftists here know | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17260 | I think Bill is saying that, if Krugman has a copy of the letter, he would produ | Constant Reader | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17259 | That looks interesting, and I'll read it later. Have to go now -- a friend o | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17258 | Have you or have you not seen this so called non-exoneration letter? My sense i | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17257 | Anything's possible. I'm just surprised I haven't heard the allegati | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17256 | LOL. I'm tired of going to the trouble of answering you substantively, and | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17255 | Here's an interesting piece from this mornings New York Times. Apparently s | Poet | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17254 | Bull. No parallel here. | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17253 | <i>I was aghast then that politicians would be so aroused by the smell of | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17252 | I think that is entirely possible, given his highly partisan reputation. | Constant Reader | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17251 | The National Review doesn't think the American people have enough of the doc | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17250 | Got you, don't I? You have no response. I asked a question, you accuse me o | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17249 | We will never know, I suppose, whether the case was not pursued because there wa | Dayuhan | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17248 | Yep. Plenty of dirt to go around. We can make up all kinds of stuff too.... JL | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17247 | Is this your idea, or have you some other source for the allegation that Krugman | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17246 | <i>I continue to watch this with a combination of sadness and amusement. | E | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17245 | Excellent places to start... Linda Daschle has not been exonerated and I want al | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17244 | OK Karen, I see where you're coming from on this. But I hope you don't | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17243 | I wonder if you all realize how silly you sound when you post this kind of demol | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17242 | Yes. Indeed it is. No need for Bush to do so however. He's got nothing to | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17241 | Yes. Indeed. I want to see all of Linda Dasshole's lobbying contracts with | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17240 | <i>Or does you watchful "non-biased" eye think it's OK to re | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17239 | I think I'll pluck a Rush Limbaugh piece and start quoting his opinions as f | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17238 | Based on Krugman's now discredited piece, you said there is a letter saying | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17237 | If it isn't news, why did every network carry the allegation (now proved fal | Bill | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17236 | <i>I just think The Effect of Motivation On Perception, or as Karen would | Lane3 | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17235 | The plain fact is there was something in WW. The director of the FBI himself wa | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
| 17234 | Publicintegrity.com received all the docs. from the SEC (under FOIA) and posted | jlallen | - | 7/12/2002 |
