SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
USRX
An SI Board Since November 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
18024 14 0
Emcee:  damniseedemons Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17649 FUD = Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt.Scrapps-4/24/1997
17648 Anyone, Please define FUD. ThanksALEKS NIKOLICH-4/24/1997
17647 Huh???Scrapps-4/24/1997
17646 Scrapps, the market has spoken over the last month about the potential impact oBrendan W-4/24/1997
17645 Just what do you do with snake oil? Lube your snake? Burn it in place of midniScrapps-4/24/1997
17644 INTEL is not shaking. They have $5 billion in cash. The proof is in the puddiFrank DiLorenzo-4/24/1997
17643 Brendan Intel has done nothing to decrease the value of COMS stock price other Scrapps-4/24/1997
17642 THIS DEAL STINKS. VOTE NO! All USRX shareholders should vote no to this mergerFrank DiLorenzo-4/24/1997
17641 Fred, discouraging this merger is not necessarily a disagreement about strategiBrendan W-4/24/1997
17640 count me in...ralph keating-4/24/1997
17639 Edward I really don't think there is any stopping this merger, and if that Scrapps-4/24/1997
17638 I am just as frustrated over the merger of COMS and USRX. One thing we can doEdward Yao-4/24/1997
17637 <i>How would you feel about the merger if the terms were sweetened from 1Lost in New York-4/24/1997
17636 Chris, Yes this all sounds good, earnings, growth, margins....but USRX is goingwilliam miller-4/24/1997
17635 Glenn, good point. As a USRX stockholder, I was still thinking of the merger fWolverine-4/24/1997
17634 <i>How would you feel about the merger if the terms were sweetened from Glenn D. Rudolph-4/24/1997
17633 <i>Casey will be voting yes, and perhaps you personally know some big inGlenn D. Rudolph-4/24/1997
17632 Thomas, <<Another cloud is the expectations by the company in it's fPat Buglak-4/24/1997
17631 Dwight, <<"The Street" apparently doesn't like this deal.&Fred Fahmy-4/24/1997
17630 Thomas, re >Some questions about the future that may prompt some selling?<Dwight E. Karlsen-4/24/1997
17629 How would you feel about the merger if the terms were sweetened from 1.75 shareWolverine-4/24/1997
17628 Fred, I know my few shares/votes will be meaningless by themselves, but just thDwight E. Karlsen-4/24/1997
17627 Hi Fred. Good points, as usual. Haven't seen you around for awhile. Are youDavid Lawrence-4/24/1997
17626 Thomas, you asked: <i>Was 90 whatever cents on a gain or operarting numbMoonray-4/24/1997
17625 jmac The merger has to be approved by shareholders of both companies. As I havJohn Stopforth-4/23/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News