SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1894 6 0
Emcee:  Iceberg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
344 >with these guys, you have the *opportunity* to react with some predictabiliIceberg-5/10/1997
343 Ice: From my previous post: "If an individual here correctly observes a Bill Ulrich-5/10/1997
342 >Greenspan is a legitimate public figure whose comments have a direct influeIceberg-5/10/1997
341 <<...If Greenspan were posting his comments here at SI, wouldn't he bBill Ulrich-5/10/1997
340 Linda and Bill, I agree completely with you, because even a cursory linguisticFuzzFace-5/10/1997
339 To All: If Greenspan were posting his comments here at SI, wouldn't he be Iceberg-5/10/1997
338 Ice, All Some percolations on a few subjects -- 1. The re-posting of our typBill Ulrich-5/10/1997
337 To All: Off-topic question ==> Who is it that moves the markets? For examIceberg-5/10/1997
336 GM, I think what we need to realize about Liz' postings -- is they were an Linda Pearson-5/10/1997
335 ICE, in one post she said she came to the thread to learn about investing. ButGottfried-5/10/1997
334 >ICE, that was an example of what not to say. Gottfried, What, the &quoIceberg-5/10/1997
333 >I was tempted, but didn't reply to her. Gottfried, In reviewing tIceberg-5/10/1997
332 ICE, that was an example of what <i>not </i>to say. GM <eom>Gottfried-5/10/1997
331 ICE, I agree. I was tempted, but didn't reply to her. It is understandableGottfried-5/10/1997
330 >I'm learning from this. The saying about old dogs is not true. GottfriIceberg-5/10/1997
329 >I suppose you have all seen the different ways people tried to deal with LiIceberg-5/10/1997
328 **Classification of Problem Posters and Suggested Response Protocols** Iceberg-5/10/1997
327 ICE, I suppose you have all seen the different ways people tried to deal with LGottfried-5/9/1997
326 >I'd hate to lose #1 because of #2. MrB, Context and intent enter tIceberg-5/9/1997
325 >[I should have said, "I suppose we have to put up with others' libIceberg-5/9/1997
324 ICE, you're right. I could learn from him. Gottfried <eom>Gottfried-5/9/1997
323 >He can't learn from us. Gottfried, That's not what I had in miIceberg-5/9/1997
322 >As an aside....I just wanted to make sure I'm understanding the types aIceberg-5/9/1997
321 Good idea Iceberg, and good post, Gottfried, for bringing it in. <<..PerBill Ulrich-5/8/1997
320 ICE, well - I'd just commend him. He can't learn from us. GottfriedGottfried-5/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):