SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Proposed $.10 per Minute Internet Charge
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
112 2 0
Emcee:  CynicalTruth Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
62 Since this is an investment thread, how about a list of companies that will benRoger A. Babb-2/9/1997
61 My guess is that mandatory per minute internet charges will play well to a RepuRoger A. Babb-2/9/1997
60 James, H&Q's clients are the ISPs, the web-content-creators, the compuJohn Grandy-2/9/1997
59 RE > The H&Q report spells it out.> that propagda sheet don't telJames F. Hopkins-2/9/1997
58 James, First off, the baby bells' monopolies on local service have already John Grandy-2/9/1997
57 John...Well, I don't know who'll win the race through the *.zip files -GW Riedeman-2/9/1997
56 I never said .10 is the "fair" value. I do not know how you possiblyJohn Grandy-2/9/1997
55 HI Anita: I don't even want to hear about .10 min on any conditions, NOT EVJames F. Hopkins-2/9/1997
54 John, the fact remains that I and others access the Internet through a local teChuck Agger-2/9/1997
53 What numbers are you using to back up your theory of exploitation of the middleBipin Prasad-2/9/1997
52 You are so badly misinformed it is completely pathetic. <<< HambrechtJohn Grandy-2/9/1997
51 Where did $0.10 come from anyway? I can assure you that the additional cost peyard_man-2/9/1997
50 I don't work for the TelCos, John. Sorry to dissapoint you. I am an indepJohn Grandy-2/9/1997
49 Jim et al -- Most of us want to connect to the internet at speeds of 28.8 or evAnita Hunt-2/9/1997
48 Hi Jeff: that was good reading: Here is a little tke of mine; Hi Jeff: REJames F. Hopkins-2/9/1997
47 I thought this was a good read. techstocks.com JEFFJeffery E. Forrest-2/9/1997
46 Emile...<i>"Do not be deceived. This is an attempt to stifle communiCynicalTruth-2/9/1997
45 Hi John..Since us taxpayers are now subsidizing the ISP's so we can have chCynicalTruth-2/9/1997
44 Gary... Great! Worded very nicely. Direct and to the point. One thing don'tCynicalTruth-2/9/1997
43 John---Hambrecht & Quist have obviously shorted ISP comapanies and related Emile Vidrine-2/9/1997
42 Later in the report Hambrecht & Quist explain that it is the computer indusJohn Grandy-2/9/1997
41 Hambrecht & Quist go on to explain exactly how the ISPs tried to take advanJohn Grandy-2/9/1997
40 This is excerpted from the latest Hambrecht & Quist report on the internet.John Grandy-2/9/1997
39 Your're all wrong. A per-minute charge is exactly what the internet needs John Grandy-2/9/1997
38 Here's my e-mail to the FCC and Sen. Hutchison... To whom it may concern: Gary Walker-2/9/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):