IMMM ( I'm Mad Monk) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
IMMM ( I'm Mad Monk)

An SI Board Since January 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1480	7	0

Emcee: Mad Monk	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
980	per, Looks like Ernst is a company someone would use to sell their shares for	Sidney Reilly	-	6/2/1997
979	Mike, I agree with you that if this was a scam, they would loose a golden oppo	per strandberg	-	6/2/1997
978	Mike, You make a good point about disinformation. Gerry	Gerald Underwood	-	6/2/1997
977	Tony, The 'hide and dump' hypothesis is interesting. As I have watched	Michael T Currie	-	6/2/1997
976	Bob, As the old proverb goes, we are trying to see through a glass darkly. Wit	Gerald Underwood	-	6/1/1997
975	Gerry, Do you think the action last week with the high volume and a few penni	Sidney Reilly	-	6/1/1997
974	jack, Thanks for digging for that. It is a very good reason for a news blacko	Sidney Reilly	-	6/1/1997
973	Jack Excellent job! I think that makes a great deal of sense. It would seem t	Tummus1	-	6/1/1997
972	Bob, Checked out UPR's 10-Q of 05-14-97 and saw they have some notes in th	beio	-	6/1/1997
971	Bob, I think the odds are against the holes being dry. After all that's w	Gerald Underwood	-	6/1/1997
970	Bob UNfortunately, one negative scenario is that UPR is not sitting on the news	Tummus1	-	6/1/1997
969	Gerry, That's what I was thinking also. If the results were bad then UPR	Sidney Reilly	-	6/1/1997
968	Michael, Thanks for the quick response. We all appreciate the thoughts of som	beio	-	6/1/1997
967	I do not want you to get your hopes too high, but the positive possibility woul	Michael T Currie	-	5/31/1997
966	Thanks for the pointer to the Forbes article. Great information. A MUST read f	Mark Donahue	-	5/31/1997
965	Thank you Michael At least you think that there are some Positive reasons for d	Tummus1	-	5/31/1997
964	Jack, There are a number of reasons to keep a hole tight. Unfortunately for yo	Michael T Currie	-	5/31/1997
963	Bob, You pose some interesting thoughts. If short position is not held by MM&#	David Wideman	-	5/31/1997
962	Ray, Thanks for info on selling shares when they are in your physical possessi	David Wideman	-	5/31/1997
961	Michael, Being closer to the business than I or some others what's your t	beio	-	5/31/1997
960	Alan, It appears that we can glean one thing from the site being declared as &	Gerald Underwood	-	5/30/1997
959	Hi William and all, I don't know about UPR policy, but I stake gas pipelin	alan w	-	5/30/1997
958	Dave, What if MM's are not shorting the stock as they have stated. But	Sidney Reilly	-	5/30/1997
957	anyone, why would UPR (or any company for that matter) consider a hole "T	smackdown	-	5/30/1997
956	Bob, If you have physical possession of your shares you can call your broker	Ray Juliano	-	5/30/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):