SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
CTSI - CABG Minimally Invasive
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
29 0 0
Emcee:  Pierre Borczuk Type:  Unmoderated
Does anyone know who the players are in this arena? I think HeartPort have a minimally invasive system, and it looks like CTSI. I think this is the future for this type of surgery, just like laparoscopic procedures for gallbladders, and appendices have become the norm

PORTOLA VALLEY, Calif., July 30 /PRNewswire/ via Individual Inc. -- CardioThoracic Systems, Inc., (Nasdaq: CTSI) announced today that, since its FDA clearance in May, the CTS Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB) system has been used to perform single, double, and triple vessel beating heart bypass surgeries in more than 140 patients at eight clinical centers. The CTS Access and Stabilizer System is designed to enable surgeons to perform the MIDCAB procedure on a beating heart with the same safety and efficacy as the standard Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) procedure.

The CTS MIDCAB system is designed to provide minimally invasive access to the chest cavity through a small window between the ribs, and to completely isolate and stabilize the motion of the beating heart at the repair site during coronary bypass surgery. The stabilization system, pioneered by CTS, is critical to performing a quality repair while the heart remains beating. The company believes that the MIDCAB procedure will provide an alternative to standard bypass which involves cracking open the chest and stopping the heart.

"We are encouraged by the clinical results and physician interest in our beating heart bypass system. The ability to offer minimally invasive beating heart surgery could represent an important benefit to patients and the U.S. healthcare system," said Richard Ferrari, president and CEO, CardioThoracic Systems. "In accomplishing this milestone, CTS is one step closer to standardizing the method for performing beating heart surgery and providing widespread availability of the products necessary to perform the procedure."

A significant patient benefit of MIDCAB is the elimination of the cardiopulmonary-bypass (CPB or "heart-lung") machine which is used during standard CABG surgery. Side-effects from CPB may include strokes, multiple organ dysfunction, and/or bleeding, which are some of the most severe post-operative complications from CABG surgery. Equally as important is the rapid return of most MIDCAB patients to a normal lifestyle within days following surgery. The MIDCAB procedure results in a small, two- to three-inch horizontal incision between the ribs as opposed to the traumatic, full-chest, 12-inch vertical incision and the sawing or cracking open of the chest that is required for standard CABG. As a direct result of the MIDCAB procedure, patients are experiencing significantly less operative trauma and decreased post-surgical complications. MIDCAB clinicians report significant patient benefits over those who have received the standard CABG procedure, including greatly improved recovery times, shorter ICU and hospital stays, reduced post-operative complications and lower procedure costs.

CTS, headquartered in Portola Valley, Calif., is a leader in the emerging field of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery. The company is developing proprietary, disposable instruments and systems designed to enable cardiothoracic surgeons to perform Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Bypass (MIDCAB) surgery. CTS is also engaged in the development of minimally invasive surgical systems for saphenous vein harvesting and coronary valve surgery. The company's common stock is traded over the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol CTSI.

Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this news release are forward looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties, including receipt and timing of regulatory approvals, availability and market acceptance of new products, and the management of growth. For further information, refer to the risk factors in the company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, relating to its initial public offering that occurred in April 1996, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and its related prospectus dated April 18, 1994. Copies of the filed prospectus can be obtained by calling investor relations at CTS.

/CONTACT: Richard M. Ferrari, CEO, or Steve Van Dick, CFO, both of CardioThoracic Systems, 415-529-0250; Ann Trunko, general information, or Kate Rajeck, analyst contact, both of Financial Relations Board, 415-986-1591; Mark Bizzell or Laura Brooks, media relations at Porter/Novelli, 310-444-7000/ (CTSI)
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
29 ÿ<Picture> Click for a no-hassle term life insurance quote! Enable Pierre Borczuk-1/20/1997
28 Value health (VH) in a 1.3b$ merger. VH seems to cater to a wide range of membeRobert Salasidis-1/16/1997
27 Robert- What competitor is Columbia buying? DanDan Hughes-1/16/1997
26 Columbia/HCA is merging (buying out) a competitor. This should instantly increaRobert Salasidis-1/16/1997
25 << When a procedure is performed with the CTSI system, non-bypass, a Bob Jagow-1/15/1997
24 Stunning the heart refers to ischemia or other insults to the heart that have aRobert Salasidis-1/15/1997
23 HPRT costs are generally $10,000 more per procedure than CTSI's this comes Dan Hughes-1/15/1997
22 Dan, Where are cost figures available? The two seem also to differ in thaBob Jagow-1/14/1997
21 I think HPRT will be the better shortterm play but I really believe that CTSI wDan Hughes-1/14/1997
20 I understood very little of that <g>, but re the stroke complications Bob Jagow-1/14/1997
19 I know of some institutions doing two bypasses with the CTSI system, they have Dan Hughes-1/13/1997
18 Yes indeed CTSI is limited to single bypass (IMA to LAD usually). Most open heaRobert Salasidis-1/13/1997
17 I have HPRT and wonder whether to buy CTSI and how the two will face off. Bob Jagow-1/13/1997
16 There is actually another CTSI thread, but only one or two messages there...I aPierre Borczuk-1/8/1997
15 Some good news on CTSI today - and the stock responded - maybe this will now atRobert Salasidis-1/7/1997
14 Any news on how CTSI is going to do at the AHA meetings this week in New OrleanPierre Borczuk-11/10/1996
13 Yes I read that NEJM paper. Althought here was not a significant difference in Robert Salasidis-9/28/1996
12 We just saw a PTCA vs CABG trial in NEJM...thats a decade after PTCA's havPierre Borczuk-9/27/1996
11 I had bought all the shares I wanted in this stock back at 22 before the drop. Robert Salasidis-9/27/1996
10 How does one know when to buy more shares...Part of me would like to see this sPierre Borczuk-9/26/1996
9 Well up to 21$ today. Looking back on all the messages though, it appears thereRobert Salasidis-9/26/1996
8 I just got the investment package from CTSI, and the Piper Jaffray, and UBS repPierre Borczuk-9/26/1996
7 The stock has done really well since the HMO announcement. The stock is now traRobert Salasidis-9/25/1996
6 Just trying to keep this thread alive...nice to see the stock over 18! PierrePierre Borczuk-9/11/1996
5 That's the only news I've heard. It is an HMO hospital though, and it iRobert Salasidis-8/28/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):